ArticleBMC family practice2014
Developing a good practice model to evaluate the effectiveness of comprehensive primary health care in local communities.
Article in BMC family practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Australian Community Health and Primary Health Care Policies from 1970s to 2020s: A Policy Analysis of Changing Interpretations.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2026Article
- Digital health technologies to improve access to comprehensive primary health care in remote Northern Territory, Australia: qualitative findings from thought leader interviews.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Optimizing Digital Solutions to Improve Access to Comprehensive Primary Health Care Services in Remote Indigenous Communities: Protocol for a Participatory Action Research Project.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Medicare policy changes to primary health care funding for Australia's indigenous Peoples 1996-2023: a scoping review.International journal for equity in health · 2024Article
- Development of a workplace breastfeeding support practice model in South Africa.International breastfeeding journal · 2024Article
- Drivers of the Australian Health System towards Health Care for All: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis.BioMed research international · 2023Article
- Identifying barriers and enablers for benzodiazepine (de)prescription: a qualitative study with patients and healthcare professionals.Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2022Article
- Why Community Health Systems Have Not Flourished in High Income Countries: What the Australian Experience Tells Us.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- Model of care, Noma Children's Hospital, northwest Nigeria.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2021Article
- Factors supporting retention of health and wellbeing staff in Aboriginal health services: a strength-based case study.Human resources for health · 2021Article
- The feasibility and potential use of case-tracked client journeys in primary healthcare: a pilot study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Factors supporting retention of aboriginal health and wellbeing staff in Aboriginal health services: a comprehensive review of the literature.International journal for equity in health · 2019Review
- From Mid-Level Policy Analysis to Macro-Level Political Economy Comment on "Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia".International journal of health policy and management · 2018Article
- Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia.International journal of health policy and management · 2018Article
- A Website Supporting Sensitive Religious and Cultural Advance Care Planning (ACPTalk): Formative and Summative Evaluation.JMIR research protocols · 2018Article
- Article
- Case Study of an Aboriginal Community-Controlled Health Service in Australia: Universal, Rights-Based, Publicly Funded Comprehensive Primary Health Care in Action.Health and human rights · 2016Article
- Taking a look to promoting health and complications' prevention: differences by context.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2016Article
- The Development of Instrument to Assess Physician's Practice in the Management of Patients With Terminal Diseases.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis paper describes the development of a model of Comprehensive Primary Health Care (CPHC) applicable to the Australian context. CPHC holds promise as an effective model of health system organization able to improve population health and increase health equity. However, there is little literature that describes and evaluates CPHC as a whole, with most evaluation focusing on specific programs. The lack of a consensus on what constitutes CPHC, and the complex and context-sensitive nature of CPHC are all barriers to evaluation.
methodsThe research was undertaken in partnership with six Australian primary health care services: four state government funded and managed services, one sexual health non-government organization, and one Aboriginal community controlled health service. A draft model was crafted combining program logic and theory-based approaches, drawing on relevant literature, 68 interviews with primary health care service staff, and researcher experience. The model was then refined through an iterative process involving two to three workshops at each of the six participating primary health care services, engaging health service staff, regional health executives and central health department staff.
resultsThe resultant Southgate Model of CPHC in Australia model articulates the theory of change of how and why CPHC service components and activities, based on the theory, evidence and values which underpin a CPHC approach, are likely to lead to individual and population health outcomes and increased health equity. The model captures the importance of context, the mechanisms of CPHC, and the space for action services have to work within. The process of development engendered and supported collaborative relationships between researchers and stakeholders and the product provided a description of CPHC as a whole and a framework for evaluation. The model was endorsed at a research symposium involving investigators, service staff, and key stakeholders.
conclusionsThe development of a theory-based program logic model provided a framework for evaluation that allows the tracking of progress towards desired outcomes and exploration of the particular aspects of context and mechanisms that produce outcomes. This is important because there are no existing models which enable the evaluation of CPHC services in their entirety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.