Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885689›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2014

Delivery, immediate newborn and cord care practices in Pemba Tanzania: a qualitative study of community, hospital staff and community level care providers for knowledge, attitudes, belief systems and practices.

Usha Dhingra, Joel Gittelsohn, Atifa Moh'd Suleiman, Shekhia Moh'd Suleiman, Arup Dutta, Said Mohammed Ali, Shilpi Gupta, Robert E Black, Sunil Sazawal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01528852 (Efficacy of Use of Chlorhexidine to Clean Umbilical Cord of Neonates in First 10 Days for Reduction in Neonatal Mortality and Omphalitis - A Community Based Randomized, Double Masked Controlled Trial in Pemba Tanzania), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01528852 phase3completednot on this map

Efficacy of Use of Chlorhexidine to Clean Umbilical Cord of Neonates in First 10 Days for Reduction in Neonatal Mortality and Omphalitis - A Community Based Randomized, Double Masked Controlled Trial in Pemba Tanzania

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2011 to 2014Enrolled36,911ConditionsNeonatal Mortality, Cord Care, OmphalitisArmsChlorhexidine 4%, Control cord cleaning solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Usha Dhingra
Joel Gittelsohn
Atifa Moh'd Suleiman
Shekhia Moh'd Suleiman
Arup Dutta
Said Mohammed Ali
Shilpi Gupta
Robert E Black
Sunil SazawalDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Room E 5521, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. ssazawal@jhsph.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeaths during the neonatal period account for almost two-thirds of all deaths in the first year of life and 40 percent of deaths before the age of five. Most of these deaths could be prevented through proven cost-effective interventions. Although there are some recent data from sub-Saharan Africa, but there is paucity of qualitative data from Zanzibar and cord care practices data from most of East Africa. We undertook a qualitative study in Pemba Island as a pilot to explore the attitudes, beliefs and practices of the community and health workers related to delivery, newborn and cord care with the potential to inform the main chlorhexidine (CHX) trial.

methods80 in-depth interviews (IDI) and 11 focus group discussions (FGD) involving mothers, grandmothers, fathers, traditional birth attendants and other health service providers from the community were undertaken. All IDIs and FGDs were audio taped, transcribed and analyzed using ATLAS ti 6.2.

resultsPoor transportation, cost of delivery at hospitals, overcrowding and ill treatment by hospital staff are some of the obstacles for achieving higher institutional delivery. TBAs and health professionals understand the need of using sterilized equipments to reduce risk of infection to both mothers and their babies during delivery. Despite this knowledge, use of gloves during delivery and hand washing before delivery were seldom reported. Early initiation of breastfeeding and feeding colostrum was almost universal. Hospital personnel and trained TBAs understood the importance of keeping babies warm after birth and delayed baby's first bath. The importance of cord care was well recognized in the community. Nearly all TBAs counseled the mothers to protect the cord from dust, flies and mosquitoes or any other kind of infections by covering it with cloth. There was consensus among respondents that CHX liquid cord cleansing could be successfully implemented in the community with appropriate education and awareness.

conclusionThe willingness of community in accepting a CHX cord care practice was very high; the only requirement was that a MCH worker needs to do and demonstrate the use to the mother.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01528852.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant CareUmbilical CordAnti-Infective Agents, LocalAttitude of Health PersonnelBathsBreast FeedingChlorhexidineCommunity Health WorkersDelivery, ObstetricFathersFemaleGloves, ProtectiveHand DisinfectionHealth BehaviorHumansAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidine

Identifiers

PMID24885689
PMCPMC4049503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.