Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885474›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2014

Early intervention in Alzheimer's disease: a health economic study of the effects of diagnostic timing.

Jennifer H Barnett, Lily Lewis, Andrew D Blackwell, Matthew Taylor

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05568381 (Sleep Disturbance in MCI), which is not on this map. Cited by 99 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05568381 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Sleep Disturbance in MCI: A Pilot Study of a Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Digital Intervention (SUCCEED)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SydneyRan2023 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsCognitive Dysfunction, Insomnia, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive DisorderArmsdigital CBT-I, Online Sleep Health Education package
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Time to Diagnosis in Dementia: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Interface focus · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer H Barnett
Lily Lewis
Andrew D BlackwellCambridge Cognition, 9 Tunbridge Court, Bottisham, CB25 9TU Cambridge, UK. andrew.blackwell@camcog.com.
Matthew Taylor
University of Cambridge · GBLeeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntervention and treatment in Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD-dementia) can be cost effective but the majority of patients are not diagnosed in a timely manner. Technology is now available that can enable the earlier detection of cognitive loss associated with incipient dementia, offering the potential for earlier intervention in the UK health care system. This study aimed to determine to what extent the timing of an intervention affects its cost-effectiveness.

methodsUsing published data describing cognitive decline in the years prior to an AD diagnosis, we modelled the effects on healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years of hypothetical symptomatic and disease-modifying interventions. Early and standard interventions were assumed to have equal clinical effects, but the early intervention could be applied up to eight years prior to standard diagnosis.

resultsA symptomatic treatment which immediately improved cognition by one MMSE point and reduced in efficacy over three years, would produce a maximum net benefit when applied at the earliest timepoint considered, i.e. eight years prior to standard diagnosis. In this scenario, the net benefit was reduced by around 17% for every year that intervention was delayed. In contrast, for a disease-modifying intervention which halted cognitive decline for one year, economic benefits would peak when treatment effects were applied two years prior to standard diagnosis. In these models, the maximum net benefit of the disease modifying intervention was fifteen times larger than that of the symptomatic treatment.

conclusionTimeliness of intervention is likely to have an important impact on the cost-effectiveness of both current and future treatments. Healthcare policy should aim to optimise the timing of AD-dementia diagnosis, which is likely to necessitate detecting and treating patients several years prior to current clinical practice.

Indexed as

Early Medical InterventionAge FactorsAlzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsCognition DisordersCohort StudiesCost-Benefit AnalysisLongitudinal StudiesNeuropsychological TestsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsCholinesterase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24885474
PMCPMC4032565
OpenAlexW1977375832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.