Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885402›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Nucleosome positioning and histone modifications define relationships between regulatory elements and nearby gene expression in breast epithelial cells.

Suhn Kyong Rhie, Dennis J Hazelett, Simon G Coetzee, Chunli Yan, Houtan Noushmehr, Gerhard A Coetzee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Serine starvation silences estrogen receptor signaling through histone hypoacetylation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. MCF-7 as a Model for Functional Analysis of Breast Cancer Risk Variants.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Suhn Kyong Rhie
Dennis J Hazelett
Simon G Coetzee
Chunli Yan
Houtan Noushmehr
Gerhard A CoetzeeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA. coetzee@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Prostate Cancer Risk EnhancersR01CA136924 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI COETZEE, GERHARD A, FARNHAM, PEGGY J · 2010 to 2019
$5.4M
VIRAL AND CHEMICAL CARCINOGENESIST32CA009320 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JONES, PETER A · 1985 to 2012
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136924NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009320NCI NIH HHS T32CA009320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe precise nature of how cell type specific chromatin structures at enhancer sites affect gene expression is largely unknown. Here we identified cell type specific enhancers coupled with gene expression in two different types of breast epithelial cells, HMEC (normal breast epithelial cells) and MDAMB231 (triple negative breast cancer cell line).

resultsEnhancers were defined by modified neighboring histones [using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq)] and nucleosome depletion [using formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements followed by sequencing (FAIRE-seq)]. Histone modifications at enhancers were related to the expression levels of nearby genes up to 750 kb away. These expression levels were correlated with enhancer status (poised or active), defined by surrounding histone marks. Furthermore, about fifty percent of poised and active enhancers contained nucleosome-depleted regions. We also identified response element motifs enriched at these enhancer sites that revealed key transcription factors (e.g. TP63) likely involved in regulating breast epithelial enhancer-mediated gene expression. By utilizing expression data, potential target genes of more than 600 active enhancers were identified. These genes were involved in proteolysis, epidermis development, cell adhesion, mitosis, cell cycle, and DNA replication.

conclusionsThese findings facilitate the understanding of epigenetic regulation specifically, such as the relationships between regulatory elements and gene expression and generally, how breast epithelial cellular phenotypes are determined by cell type specific enhancers.

Indexed as

NucleosomesRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidCell Line, TumorFemaleHistonesHumansMammary Glands, HumanTranscription FactorsHistonesNucleosomesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24885402
PMCPMC4035062
OpenAlexW2159442369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.