Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885289›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 532015

The Impact of Intensive Reading Intervention on Level of Attention in Middle School Students.

Greg Roberts, Shruti Rane, Anna-Mária Fall, Carolyn A Denton, Jack M Fletcher, Sharon Vaughn

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sustained attention and behavioral ratings of attention in struggling readers.Scientific studies of reading : the official journal of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cognitive Attributes, Attention, and Self-Efficacy of Adequate and Inadequate Responders in a Fourth Grade Reading Intervention.Learning disabilities research & practice : a publication of the Division for Learning Disabilities, Council for Exceptional Children · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Greg Robertsa The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk , University of Texas at Austin.
Shruti Raneb Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute , Johns Hopkins University.
Anna-Mária Falla The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk , University of Texas at Austin.
Carolyn A Dentonc Department of Pediatrics , University of Texas Health Science Center Houston.
Jack M Fletcherd Department of Psychology , University of Houston.
Sharon Vaughna The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk , University of Texas at Austin.
The University of Texas at Austin · USJohns Hopkins University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Texas Center for Learning DisabilitiesP50HD052117 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI FLETCHER, JACK M · 2006 to 2023
$26.9M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
Reading ICARD: Interventions for Children With Attention and Reading DisordersR01HD060617 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI DENTON, CAROLYN A · 2010 to 2014
$4.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD052117NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060617
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to estimate the impact of reading intervention on ratings of student attention over time. We used extant data from a longitudinal randomized study of a response-based reading intervention to fit a multiple-indicator, multilevel growth model. The sample at randomization was 54% male, 18% limited English proficient, 85% eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, 58% African American, and 32% Hispanic. Reading ability was measured by using the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Attention was measured by using the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior Scale. Findings indicate that intensive, response-based reading intervention over 3 years improved reading achievement and behavioral attention in middle school struggling readers, with treatment directly affecting reading, which in turn influenced attention. In the business-as-usual condition, there was no relation between improved reading and attention. The results are consistent with a correlated liabilities model of comorbidity. The results do not align with the inattention-as-cause hypothesis, which predicts that reading intervention should not affect attention. The findings do not support, but do not necessarily preclude, the phenocopy hypothesis. The results are especially pertinent for older students who may be inattentive partly because of years of struggling with reading.

Indexed as

AttentionBlack or African AmericanHispanic or LatinoReadingSchoolsAchievementAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental DisordersStudents

Identifiers

PMID24885289
PMCPMC4254375
OpenAlexW2047507763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.