Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24885236›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2014

Translating a gene expression signature for multiple myeloma prognosis into a robust high-throughput assay for clinical use.

Ryan van Laar, Rachel Flinchum, Nathan Brown, Joseph Ramsey, Sam Riccitelli, Christoph Heuck, Bart Barlogie, John D Shaughnessy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Bone marrow morphologic features, MyPRS, and gene mutation correlations in plasma cell myeloma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current Role of Genetics in Hematologic Malignancies.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ryan van LaarSignal Genetics, 667 Madison Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY 10065, USA. rvanlaar@signalgenetics.com.
Rachel Flinchum
Nathan Brown
Joseph Ramsey
Sam Riccitelli
Christoph Heuck
Bart Barlogie
John D Shaughnessy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWidespread adoption of genomic technologies in the management of heterogeneous indications, including Multiple Myeloma, has been hindered by concern over variation between published gene expression signatures, difficulty in physician interpretation and the challenge of obtaining sufficient genetic material from limited patient specimens.

methodsSince 2006, the 70-gene prognostic signature, developed by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) has been applied to over 4,700 patients in studies performed in 4 countries and described in 17 peer-reviewed publications. Analysis of control sample and quality control data compiled over a 12-month period was performed.

resultsOver a 12 month period, the 70-gene prognosis score (range 0-100) of our multiple myeloma cell-line control sample had a standard deviation of 2.72 and a coefficient of variance of 0.03. The whole-genome microarray profile used to calculate a patient's GEP70 score can be generated with as little as 15 ng of total RNA; approximately 30,000 CD-138+ plasma cells. Results from each GEP70 analysis are presented as either low (70-gene score <45.2) or high (≥45.2) risk for relapse (newly diagnosed setting) or shorter overall survival (relapse setting). A personalized and outcome-annotated gene expression heat map is provided to assist in the clinical interpretation of the result.

conclusionsThe 70-gene assay, commercialized under the name 'MyPRS®' (Myeloma Prognostic Risk Score) and performed in Signal Genetics' CLIA-certified high throughput flow-cytometry and molecular profiling laboratory is a reproducible and standardized method of multiple myeloma prognostication.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBiopsy, NeedleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMultiple MyelomaOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPeer Review, ResearchPlasma CellsPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRNASyndecan-1Treatment OutcomeRNASyndecan-1

Identifiers

PMID24885236
PMCPMC4032347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.