ArticleMolecular cancer2014
Analyses of clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic associations of KRAS codon 61 and codon 146 mutations in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review.
Article in Molecular cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
104 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of KRAS G12C Mutation and Co-mutations and Associated Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.The oncologist · 2023Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of MSI frequency and race in colorectal cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- High Frequency of KRAS Codon 146 and FBXW7 Mutations in Thai Patients with Stage II-III Colon Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Trial
- Tumor Vascular Features and Colorectal Cancer-Specific Mortality.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- A Clinical and Molecular Comparative Analysis of KRAS Exon 2 and KRAS Non-Exon 2 Mutated Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Metabolic regulation of histone acetylation by ACLY supports MDR1 expression in colorectal cancer and highlights a targetable vulnerability.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- KRAS-targeted therapies in colorectal cancer: a systematic analysis of mutations, inhibitors, and clinical trials.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical and prognostic characteristics of metastatic colorectal cancer with minorOncology letters · 2025Article
- Waist Circumference, a Body Shape Index, and Molecular Subtypes of Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Four Cohort Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Developing and validation a prognostic model for predicting prognosis among synchronous colorectal cancers patients using combined log odds ratio of positive lymph nodes: a SEER database study.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Cancer treatment monitoring using cell-free DNA fragmentomes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Identifying modifiable risk factors to prevent aggressive colorectal cancer.International journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic features of colorectal carcinomas with KRAS c.34G>T (p.G12C) mutation.Cancer science · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of gene mutations and mismatch repair in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Focus onCancers · 2024Article
- Mutation Profile via Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Its Clinicopathological Correlation.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Vitamin C intake and colorectal cancer survival according to KRAS and BRAF mutation: a prospective study in two US cohorts.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Different oncological features of colorectal cancer codon-specificWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2023Observational
- Bayesian risk prediction model for colorectal cancer mortality through integration of clinicopathologic and genomic data.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Article
44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 are established predictive biomarkers for anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. Previous studies suggest that KRAS codon 61 and 146 mutations may also predict resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer. However, clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic features of colorectal carcinoma with KRAS codon 61 or 146 mutation remain unclear.
methodsWe utilized a molecular pathological epidemiology database of 1267 colon and rectal cancers in the Nurse's Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We examined KRAS mutations in codons 12, 13, 61 and 146 (assessed by pyrosequencing), in relation to clinicopathological features, and tumor molecular markers, including BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), LINE-1 methylation, and microsatellite instability (MSI). Survival analyses were performed in 1067 BRAF-wild-type cancers to avoid confounding by BRAF mutation. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute mortality hazard ratio, adjusting for potential confounders, including disease stage, PIK3CA mutation, CIMP, LINE-1 hypomethylation, and MSI.
resultsKRAS codon 61 mutations were detected in 19 cases (1.5%), and codon 146 mutations in 40 cases (3.2%). Overall KRAS mutation prevalence in colorectal cancers was 40% (=505/1267). Of interest, compared to KRAS-wild-type, overall, KRAS-mutated cancers more frequently exhibited cecal location (24% vs. 12% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001), CIMP-low (49% vs. 32% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001), and PIK3CA mutations (24% vs. 11% in KRAS-wild-type; P < 0.0001). These trends were evident irrespective of mutated codon, though statistical power was limited for codon 61 mutants. Neither KRAS codon 61 nor codon 146 mutation was significantly associated with clinical outcome or prognosis in univariate or multivariate analysis [colorectal cancer-specific mortality hazard ratio (HR) = 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.29-2.26 for codon 61 mutation; colorectal cancer-specific mortality HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.42-1.78 for codon 146 mutation].
conclusionsTumors with KRAS mutations in codons 61 and 146 account for an appreciable proportion (approximately 5%) of colorectal cancers, and their clinicopathological and molecular features appear generally similar to KRAS codon 12 or 13 mutated cancers. To further assess clinical utility of KRAS codon 61 and 146 testing, large-scale trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.