ArticleBMC genetics2014
Multi-population genomic prediction using a multi-task Bayesian learning model.
Article in BMC genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic prediction in a small barley population can benefit from training on related populations.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Genetic Strategies for Enhancing Rooster Fertility in Tropical and Humid Climates: Challenges and Opportunities.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Accuracy of Genomic Predictions Cross Populations with Different Linkage Disequilibrium Patterns.Genes · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Genomic prediction using a reference population of multiple pure breeds and admixed individuals.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association studies.Genetic epidemiology · 2021Article
- Theoretical Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction in Chinese Indigenous Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- Genomic prediction for numerically small breeds, using models with pre-selected and differentially weighted markers.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
- A multi-trait Bayesian method for mapping QTL and genomic prediction.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
- Multi-population Genomic Relationships for Estimating Current Genetic Variances Within and Genetic Correlations Between Populations.Genetics · 2017Article
- Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.BMC genetics · 2015Article
- Genomic Prediction Accounting for Residual Heteroskedasticity.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2015Article
- Incorporating Genetic Heterogeneity in Whole-Genome Regressions Using Interactions.Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statisticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic prediction in multiple populations can be viewed as a multi-task learning problem where tasks are to derive prediction equations for each population and multi-task learning property can be improved by sharing information across populations. The goal of this study was to develop a multi-task Bayesian learning model for multi-population genomic prediction with a strategy to effectively share information across populations. Simulation studies and real data from Holstein and Ayrshire dairy breeds with phenotypes on five milk production traits were used to evaluate the proposed multi-task Bayesian learning model and compare with a single-task model and a simple data pooling method.
resultsA multi-task Bayesian learning model was proposed for multi-population genomic prediction. Information was shared across populations through a common set of latent indicator variables while SNP effects were allowed to vary in different populations. Both simulation studies and real data analysis showed the effectiveness of the multi-task model in improving genomic prediction accuracy for the smaller Ayshire breed. Simulation studies suggested that the multi-task model was most effective when the number of QTL was small (n = 20), with an increase of accuracy by up to 0.09 when QTL effects were lowly correlated between two populations (ρ = 0.2), and up to 0.16 when QTL effects were highly correlated (ρ = 0.8). When QTL genotypes were included for training and validation, the improvements were 0.16 and 0.22, respectively, for scenarios of the low and high correlation of QTL effects between two populations. When the number of QTL was large (n = 200), improvement was small with a maximum of 0.02 when QTL genotypes were not included for genomic prediction. Reduction in accuracy was observed for the simple pooling method when the number of QTL was small and correlation of QTL effects between the two populations was low. For the real data, the multi-task model achieved an increase of accuracy between 0 and 0.07 in the Ayrshire validation set when 28,206 SNPs were used, while the simple data pooling method resulted in a reduction of accuracy for all traits except for protein percentage. When 246,668 SNPs were used, the accuracy achieved from the multi-task model increased by 0 to 0.03, while using the pooling method resulted in a reduction of accuracy by 0.01 to 0.09. In the Holstein population, the three methods had similar performance.
conclusionsResults in this study suggest that the proposed multi-task Bayesian learning model for multi-population genomic prediction is effective and has the potential to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.