Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24884811›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2014

Multicentre consensus recommendations for skin care in inherited epidermolysis bullosa.

May El Hachem, Giovanna Zambruno, Eva Bourdon-Lanoy, Annalisa Ciasulli, Christiane Buisson, Smail Hadj-Rabia, Andrea Diociaiuti, Carolina F Gouveia, Angela Hernández-Martín, Raul de Lucas Laguna and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients withJournal of market access & health policy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

May El HachemDermatology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Piazza S, Onofrio, 4, 00165 Rome, Italy. may.elhachem@opbg.net.
Giovanna Zambruno
Eva Bourdon-Lanoy
Annalisa Ciasulli
Christiane Buisson
Smail Hadj-Rabia
Andrea Diociaiuti
Carolina F Gouveia
Angela Hernández-Martín
Raul de Lucas Laguna
Mateja Dolenc-Voljč
Gianluca Tadini
Guglielmo Salvatori
Cristiana De Ranieri
Stephanie Leclerc-Mercier
Christine Bodemer
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRCentro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte · PTFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITHospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITIstituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata · ITLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises a highly heterogeneous group of rare diseases characterized by fragility and blistering of skin and mucous membranes. Clinical features combined with immunofluorescence antigen mapping and/or electron microscopy examination of a skin biopsy allow to define the EB type and subtype. Molecular diagnosis is nowadays feasible in all EB subtypes and required for prenatal diagnosis. The extent of skin and mucosal lesions varies greatly depending on EB subtype and patient age. In the more severe EB subtypes lifelong generalized blistering, chronic ulcerations and scarring sequelae lead to multiorgan involvement, major morbidity and life-threatening complications. In the absence of a cure, patient management remains based on preventive measures, together with symptomatic treatment of cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations and complications. The rarity and complexity of EB challenge its appropriate care. Thus, the aim of the present study has been to generate multicentre, multidisciplinary recommendations on global skin care addressed to physicians, nurses and other health professionals dealing with EB, both in centres of expertise and primary care setting.

methodsAlmost no controlled trials for EB treatment have been performed to date. For this reason, recommendations were prepared by a multidisciplinary team of experts from different European EB centres based on available literature and expert opinion. They have been subsequently revised by a panel of external experts, using an online-modified Delphi method to generate consensus.

resultsRecommendations are reported according to the age of the patients. The major topics treated comprise the multidisciplinary approach to EB patients, global skin care including wound care, management of itching and pain, and early diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. Aspects of therapeutic patient education, care of disease burden and continuity of care are also developed.

conclusionThe recommendations are expected to be useful for daily global care of EB patients, in particular in the community setting. An optimal management of patients is also a prerequisite to allow them to benefit from the specific molecular and cell-based treatments currently under development.

Indexed as

Epidermolysis BullosaHumansSkin

Identifiers

PMID24884811
PMCPMC4110526
OpenAlexW2101625753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.