Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24884761›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2014

Nested PCR detection of malaria directly using blood filter paper samples from epidemiological surveys.

Peipei Li, Zhenjun Zhao, Ying Wang, Hua Xing, Daniel M Parker, Zhaoqing Yang, Elizabeth Baum, Wenli Li, Jetsumon Sattabongkot, Jeeraphat Sirichaisinthop and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. UndetectedMalariaWorld journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A systematic review and meta-analysis on sub-microscopicThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Surveillance andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Peipei Li
Zhenjun Zhao
Ying Wang
Hua Xing
Daniel M Parker
Zhaoqing Yang
Elizabeth Baum
Wenli Li
Jetsumon Sattabongkot
Jeeraphat Sirichaisinthop
Shuying Li
Guiyun Yan
Liwang CuiDalian Institute of Biotechnology, Dalian, Liaoning, China. luc2@psu.edu.
Qi Fan
Dalian University of Technology · CNPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USArmy Medical University · CNKunming Medical University · CNMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THVector & Vector-Borne Diseases Research Institute · TZ

Funding

Southeast Asia Malaria Research CenterU19AI089672 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI CUI, LIWANG · 2010 to 2023
$28.9M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNested PCR is considered a sensitive and specific method for detecting malaria parasites and is especially useful in epidemiological surveys. However, the preparation of DNA templates for PCR is often time-consuming and costly.

methodsA simplified PCR method was developed to directly use a small blood filter paper square (2 × 2 mm) as the DNA template after treatment with saponin. This filter paper-based nested PCR method (FP-PCR) was compared to microscopy and standard nested PCR with DNA extracted by using a Qiagen DNA mini kit from filter paper blood spots of 204 febrile cases. The FP-PCR technique was further applied to evaluate malaria infections in 1,708 participants from cross-sectional epidemiological surveys conducted in Myanmar and Thailand.

resultsThe FP-PCR method had a detection limit of ~0.2 parasites/μL blood, estimated using cultured Plasmodium falciparum parasites. With 204 field samples, the sensitivity of the FP-PCR method was comparable to that of the standard nested PCR method, which was significantly higher than that of microscopy. Application of the FP-PCR method in large cross-sectional studies conducted in Myanmar and Thailand detected 1.9% (12/638) and 6.2% (66/1,070) asymptomatic Plasmodium infections, respectively, as compared to the detection rates of 1.3% (8/638) and 0.04% (4/1,070) by microscopy.

conclusionThis FP-PCR method was much more sensitive than microscopy in detecting Plasmodium infections. It drastically increased the detection sensitivity of asymptomatic infections in cross-sectional surveys conducted in Thailand and Myanmar, suggesting that this FP-PCR method has a potential for future applications in malaria epidemiology studies.

Indexed as

DesiccationAdolescentAdultAgedBloodChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalariaMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMolecular Epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID24884761
PMCPMC4022400
OpenAlexW2106193664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.