Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24884722›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

A Randomized trial of an Asthma Internet Self-management Intervention (RAISIN): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Deborah Morrison, Sally Wyke, Neil C Thomson, Alex McConnachie, Karolina Agur, Kathryn Saunderson, Rekha Chaudhuri, Frances S Mair

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Home telemonitoring and remote feedback between clinic visits for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Remote versus face-to-face check-ups for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Deborah Morrison
Sally Wyke
Neil C Thomson
Alex McConnachie
Karolina Agur
Kathryn Saunderson
Rekha Chaudhuri
Frances S MairGeneral Practice & Primary Care, 1 Horselethill Road, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 9LX, UK. Frances.Mair@glasgow.ac.uk.
University of Glasgow · GBGartnavel General Hospital · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CAF 11/08Chief Scientist Office CAF/11/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe financial costs associated with asthma care continue to increase while care remains suboptimal. Promoting optimal self-management, including the use of asthma action plans, along with regular health professional review has been shown to be an effective strategy and is recommended in asthma guidelines internationally. Despite evidence of benefit, guided self-management remains underused, however the potential for online resources to promote self-management behaviors is gaining increasing recognition. The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol for a pilot evaluation of a website 'Living well with asthma' which has been developed with the aim of promoting self-management behaviors shown to improve outcomes. METHODS/

designThe study is a parallel randomized controlled trial, where adults with asthma are randomly assigned to either access to the website for 12 weeks, or usual asthma care for 12 weeks (followed by access to the website if desired). Individuals are included if they are over 16-years-old, have a diagnosis of asthma with an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score of greater than, or equal to 1, and have access to the internet. Primary outcomes for this evaluation include recruitment and retention rates, changes at 12 weeks from baseline for both ACQ and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores, and quantitative data describing website usage (number of times logged on, length of time logged on, number of times individual pages looked at, and for how long). Secondary outcomes include clinical outcomes (medication use, health services use, lung function) and patient reported outcomes (including adherence, patient activation measures, and health status). DISCUSSION: Piloting of complex interventions is considered best practice and will maximise the potential of any future large-scale randomized controlled trial to successfully recruit and be able to report on necessary outcomes. Here we will provide results across a range of outcomes which will provide estimates of efficacy to inform the design of a future full-scale randomized controlled trial of the 'Living well with asthma' website.

trial registrationThis trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN78556552 on 18/06/13.

Indexed as

InternetQuality of LifeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaHumansResearch DesignSelf CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Asthmatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24884722
PMCPMC4055289
OpenAlexW2090524516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.