Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24884707›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2014

Psychosocial work conditions and quality of life among primary health care employees: a cross sectional study.

Mariza Alves Barbosa Teles, Mirna Rossi Barbosa, Andréa Maria Duarte Vargas, Viviane Elizângela Gomes, Efigênia Ferreira e Ferreira, Andréa Maria Eleutério de Barros Lima Martins, Raquel Conceição Ferreira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 139 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Quality of life of Family Health Strategy professionals: a systematic review.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mariza Alves Barbosa Teles
Mirna Rossi Barbosa
Andréa Maria Duarte Vargas
Viviane Elizângela Gomes
Efigênia Ferreira e Ferreira
Andréa Maria Eleutério de Barros Lima Martins
Raquel Conceição FerreiraFederal University of Minas Gerais, 6627 Antônio Carlos Avenue, Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. ferreira_rc@hotmail.com.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Estadual de Montes Claros · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorkers in Primary Health Care are often exposed to stressful conditions at work. This study investigated the association between adverse psychosocial work conditions and poor quality of life among Primary Health Care workers.

methodsThis cross-sectional study included all 797 Primary Health Care workers of a medium-sized city, Brazil: doctors, nurses, nursing technicians and nursing assistants, dentists, oral health technicians, and auxiliary oral hygienists, and community health workers. Data were collected by interviews. Quality of life was assessed using the WHOQOL-BREF; general quality of life, as well as the physical, psychological, social and environmental domains were considered, with scores from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a better quality of life. Poor quality of life was defined by the lowest quartiles of the WHOQOL score distributions for each of the domains. Adverse psychosocial work conditions were investigated by the Effort-Reward Imbalance model. Associations were verified using multiple logistic regression.

resultsPoor quality of life was observed in 117 (15.4%) workers. Workers with imbalanced effort-reward (high effort/low reward) had an increased probability of general poor quality of life (OR = 1.91; 1.07–3.42), and in the physical (OR = 1.62; 1.02–2.66), and environmental (OR = 2.39; 1.37–4.16) domains; those with low effort/low reward demonstrated a greater probability of poor quality of life in the social domain (OR = 1.82; 1.00–3.30). Workers with overcommitment at work had an increased likelihood of poor quality of life in the physical (OR = 1.55, 1.06–2.26) and environmental (OR = 1.69; 1.08–2.65) domains. These associations were independent of individual characteristics, job characteristics, lifestyle, perception of general health, or psychological and biological functions.

conclusionsThere is an association between adverse psychosocial work conditions and poor quality of life among Primary Health Care workers.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHealth StatusHumansJob SatisfactionMalePrimary Health CarePsychologyStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID24884707
PMCPMC4122097
OpenAlexW2104961848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.