ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
The discriminant power of RNA features for pre-miRNA recognition.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- First insights into the miRNA landscape of Tursiops truncatus milk reveal shared dominant microRNA families with terrestrial mammals.PloS one · 2026Article
- From nucleotides to numbers: a comprehensive review of RNA feature extraction methods for computational modelling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- MicroRNA and Hemophilia-A Disease: Bioinformatics Prediction and Experimental Analysis.Cell journal · 2021Article
- Genome-wide computational prediction of miRNAs in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) revealed target genes involved in pulmonary vasculature and antiviral innate immunity.Molecular biology research communications · 2020Article
- Fast and accurate microRNA search using CNN.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Improved Pre-miRNAs Identification Through Mutual Information of Pre-miRNA Sequences and Structures.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Identification of pre-microRNAs by characterizing their sequence order evolution information and secondary structure graphs.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Computational prediction of miRNAs in Nipah virus genome reveals possible interaction with human genes involved in encephalitis.Molecular biology research communications · 2018Article
- On the performance of pre-microRNA detection algorithms.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Article
- Automatic learning of pre-miRNAs from different species.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- The impact of feature selection on one and two-class classification performance for plant microRNAs.PeerJ · 2016Article
- A framework for improving microRNA prediction in non-human genomes.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Dietary MicroRNA Database (DMD): An Archive Database and Analytic Tool for Food-Borne microRNAs.PloS one · 2015Article
- Computational prediction of microRNAs from Toxoplasma gondii potentially regulating the hosts' gene expression.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComputational discovery of microRNAs (miRNA) is based on pre-determined sets of features from miRNA precursors (pre-miRNA). Some feature sets are composed of sequence-structure patterns commonly found in pre-miRNAs, while others are a combination of more sophisticated RNA features. In this work, we analyze the discriminant power of seven feature sets, which are used in six pre-miRNA prediction tools. The analysis is based on the classification performance achieved with these feature sets for the training algorithms used in these tools. We also evaluate feature discrimination through the F-score and feature importance in the induction of random forests.
resultsSmall or non-significant differences were found among the estimated classification performances of classifiers induced using sets with diversification of features, despite the wide differences in their dimension. Inspired in these results, we obtained a lower-dimensional feature set, which achieved a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 95%. These estimates are within 0.1% of the maximal values obtained with any feature set (SELECT, Section "Results and discussion") while it is 34 times faster to compute. Even compared to another feature set (FS2, see Section "Results and discussion"), which is the computationally least expensive feature set of those from the literature which perform within 0.1% of the maximal values, it is 34 times faster to compute. The results obtained by the tools used as references in the experiments carried out showed that five out of these six tools have lower sensitivity or specificity.
conclusionIn miRNA discovery the number of putative miRNA loci is in the order of millions. Analysis of putative pre-miRNAs using a computationally expensive feature set would be wasteful or even unfeasible for large genomes. In this work, we propose a relatively inexpensive feature set and explore most of the learning aspects implemented in current ab-initio pre-miRNA prediction tools, which may lead to the development of efficient ab-initio pre-miRNA discovery tools.The material to reproduce the main results from this paper can be downloaded from http://bioinformatics.rutgers.edu/Static/Software/discriminant.tar.gz.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.