ReviewBMC public health2014
How can knowledge exchange portals assist in knowledge management for evidence-informed decision making in public health?
Review in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Knowledge Management Implementation and the Tools Utilized in Healthcare for Evidence-Based Decision Making: A Systematic Review.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2017Pooled it
- Evaluator's alignment as an important indicator of adequacy of the criteria and assessment procedure for recognizing the good practice in public health.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Knowledge management tools and mechanisms for evidence-informed decision-making in the WHO European Region: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Health promotion and disease prevention registries in the EU: a cross country comparison.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- Assessing the impact of knowledge communication and dissemination strategies targeted at health policy-makers and managers: an overview of systematic reviews.Health research policy and systems · 2021Review
- Developing a sampling method and preliminary taxonomy for classifying COVID-19 public health guidance for healthcare organizations and the general public.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- How can we monitor the impact of national health information systems? Results from a scoping review.European journal of public health · 2020Article
- Visualizing an Ethics Framework: A Method to Create Interactive Knowledge Visualizations From Health Policy Documents.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Article
- Right Here Right Now (RHRN) pilot study: testing a method of near-real-time data collection on the social determinants of health.Evidence & policy : a journal of research, debate and practice · 2018Article
- Looking Through a Social Lens: Conceptualising Social Aspects of Knowledge Management for Global Health Practitioners.Journal of public health research · 2017Article
- Organizational supports used by private child and family serving agencies to facilitate evidence use: a mixed methods study protocol.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- Interactive visualization of public health indicators to support policymaking: An exploratory study.Online journal of public health informatics · 2017Article
- Leveraging the Power of Knowledge Management to Transform Global Health and Development.Global health, science and practice · 2015Article
- Six Public Policy Recommendations to Increase the Translation and Utilization of Research Evidence in Public Health Practice.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge exchange portals are emerging as web tools that can help facilitate knowledge management in public health. We conducted a review to better understand the nature of these portals and their contribution to knowledge management in public health, with the aim of informing future development of portals in this field.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted of the peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify articles that described the design, development or evaluation of Knowledge Exchange Portals KEPs in the public health field. The content of the articles was analysed, interpreted and synthesised in light of the objectives of the review.
resultsThe systematic search yielded 2223 articles, of which fifteen were deemed eligible for review, including eight case studies, six evaluation studies and one commentary article. Knowledge exchange portals mainly included design features to support knowledge access and creation, but formative evaluation studies examining user needs suggested collaborative features supporting knowledge exchange would also be useful. Overall web usage statistics revealed increasing use of some of these portals over time; however difficulties remain in retaining users. There is some evidence to suggest that the use of a knowledge exchange portal in combination with tailored and targeted messaging can increase the use of evidence in policy and program decision making at the organisational level.
conclusionsKnowledge exchange portals can be a platform for providing integrated access to relevant content and resources in one location, for sharing and distributing information and for bringing people together for knowledge exchange. However more performance evaluation studies are needed to determine how they can best support evidence-informed decision making in public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.