Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24884383›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2014

Utility of a primary care based transient ischaemic attack electronic decision support tool: a prospective sequential comparison.

Annemarei Ranta, Chwan-Fen Yang, Michael Funnell, Pietro Cariga, Catherine Murphy-Rahal, Naomi Cogger

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Streamlining pre- and intra-hospital care for patients with severe trauma: a white paper from the European Critical Care Foundation.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annemarei RantaDepartment of Neurology, MidCentral Health, Private Bag 11036, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. anna.ranta@otago.ac.nz.
Chwan-Fen Yang
Michael Funnell
Pietro Cariga
Catherine Murphy-Rahal
Naomi Cogger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Reducing the incidence of stroke has the potential to not only improve health outcomes, but also lead to significant cost savings for health services. Transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) can herald an imminent stroke and following a TIA early initiation of best medical therapy significantly reduces the risk of subsequent stroke. To achieve time targets rapid access stroke specialist services have been promoted; however, a number of resource related barriers can impede specialist access and cause unnecessary time delays. Cross sector collaboration led to the development of a primary care based TIA/Stroke electronic decision support (EDS) tool. This study aimed to assess the impact of this tool on improving access and reducing management delays.

methodsThis is a prospective before (2009) versus after (2011) study of the effect on process of care following the implementation of EDS assisted TIA management in primary care. All patients presenting with TIA to secondary services were included. Outcomes assessed were TIA Guideline adherence and patient safety.

resultsOver the study period 266 patients presented for TIA assessment (130 in 2009 and 136 in 2011). Following EDS implementation the median delay to specialist assessment fell from 10 days in 2009 to three days in 2011 (HR 1.45; 95% CI 1.13-1.86; p=0.001), the number of patients achieving optimal medical therapy within 24 hours rose from 43% to 57% (RR 1.33; 95% CI 1.02-1.71; p=0.04), carotid and CT imaging were achieved significantly faster (HR 1.52 (1.02-2.26) p=0.003 and HR 1.34 (1.16-1.78 p=0.002) respectively), and there were no adverse events associated with EDS use.

conclusionThe availability of TIA/Stroke electronic decision support in the primary care setting was associated with reductions in management delays without compromising patient safety.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInternetIschemic Attack, TransientKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24884383
PMCPMC4070650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.