Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24883114›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2014

Condorcet and borda count fusion method for ligand-based virtual screening.

Ali Ahmed, Faisal Saeed, Naomie Salim, Ammar Abdo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Defining Levels of Automated Chemical Design.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantum probability ranking principle for ligand-based virtual screening.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Quantum-Based Similarity Method in Virtual Screening.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Article
  11. Journal of applied crystallography · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali AhmedSoft Computing Research Group, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia ; Faculty of Engineering, Karary University, Khartoum 12304, Sudan.
Faisal SaeedSoft Computing Research Group, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia.
Naomie SalimSoft Computing Research Group, Faculty of Computing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia.
Ammar AbdoComputer Science Department, Hodeidah University, Hodeidah, Yemen.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is known that any individual similarity measure will not always give the best recall of active molecule structure for all types of activity classes. Recently, the effectiveness of ligand-based virtual screening approaches can be enhanced by using data fusion. Data fusion can be implemented using two different approaches: group fusion and similarity fusion. Similarity fusion involves searching using multiple similarity measures. The similarity scores, or ranking, for each similarity measure are combined to obtain the final ranking of the compounds in the database.

resultsThe Condorcet fusion method was examined. This approach combines the outputs of similarity searches from eleven association and distance similarity coefficients, and then the winner measure for each class of molecules, based on Condorcet fusion, was chosen to be the best method of searching. The recall of retrieved active molecules at top 5% and significant test are used to evaluate our proposed method. The MDL drug data report (MDDR), maximum unbiased validation (MUV) and Directory of Useful Decoys (DUD) data sets were used for experiments and were represented by 2D fingerprints.

conclusionsSimulated virtual screening experiments with the standard two data sets show that the use of Condorcet fusion provides a very simple way of improving the ligand-based virtual screening, especially when the active molecules being sought have a lowest degree of structural heterogeneity. However, the effectiveness of the Condorcet fusion was increased slightly when structural sets of high diversity activities were being sought.

Indexed as

Data fusionSimilarity coefficientsSimilarity searchingVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID24883114
PMCPMC4026830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.