Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24883077›Full record

ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2014

Statistical evaluation of reproducibility of automated ECG measurements: an example from arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy clinic.

Timothy Huang, Cynthia A James, Crystal Tichnell, Brittney Murray, Joel Xue, Hugh Calkins, Larisa G Tereshchenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Digitizing ECG image: A new method and open-source software code.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Precision of automated QRS duration measurement in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy HuangWhiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cynthia A JamesThe Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Crystal TichnellThe Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brittney MurrayThe Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joel XueGE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI, USA.
Hugh CalkinsThe Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Larisa G TereshchenkoThe Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · USSiemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

Novel ECG Measures and Risk of Sudden Cardiac DeathR01HL118277 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TERESHCHENKO, LARISA GENNADIEVNA · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL118277
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is characterized by delay in depolarization of the right ventricle, detected by prolonged terminal activation duration (TAD) in V1-V3. However, manual ECG measurements have shown moderate-to-low intra- and inter-reader agreement. The goal of this study was to assess reproducibility of automated ECG measurements in the right precordial leads.

methodsPairs of ECGs recorded in the same day from Johns Hopkins ARVD/C Registry participants [n=247, mean age 35.2±15.6 y, 58% men, 92% whites, 11(4.5%) with definite ARVD/C] were retrospectively analyzed. QRS duration, intrinsicoid deflection, TAD, and T-wave amplitude in the right precordial leads, as well as averaged across all leads QRS duration, QRS axis, T axis, QTc interval, and heart rate was measured automatically, using 12SL TM algorithm (GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI, USA). Intrinsicoid deflection was measured as the time from QRS complex onset to the alignment point of the QRS complex. TAD was calculated as the difference between QRS duration and intrinsicoid in V1, V2, V3. Reproducibility was quantified by Bland-Altman analysis (bias with 95% limits of agreement), Lin's concordance coefficient, and Bradley-Blackwood procedure.

resultsBland-Altman analysis revealed satisfactory reproducibility of tested parameters. V1 QRS duration bias was -0.10ms [95% limits of agreement -12.77 to 12.56ms], V2 QRS duration bias -0.09ms [-11.13 to 10.96ms]; V1 TAD bias 0.14ms [-13.23 to 13.51ms], V2 TAD bias 0.008ms [-12.42 to 12.44ms].

conclusionComprehensive statistical evaluation of reproducibility of automated ECG measurements is important for appropriate interpretation of ECG. Automated ECG measurements are reproducible to within 25%.

Indexed as

ARVD/Cautomated measurementelectrocardiogramQRS durationreproducibilityterminal activation duration

Identifiers

PMID24883077
PMCPMC4036813
OpenAlexW2071774121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.