ArticleBiomedical signal processing and control2014
Statistical evaluation of reproducibility of automated ECG measurements: an example from arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy clinic.
Article in Biomedical signal processing and control, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digitizing ECG image: A new method and open-source software code.Computer methods and programs in biomedicine · 2022Article
- An Electrocardiographic Characterization of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing-Induced Right Ventricular Activation Delay: A Comparison With Native Right Bundle Branch Block.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- His bundle pacing shows similar ventricular electrical activation as sinus: selective and nonselective His pacing indistinguishable.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2021Article
- Seizure tracking of epileptic EEGs using a model-driven approach.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
- The Reproducibility of Global Electrical Heterogeneity ECG Measurements.Computing in cardiology · 2018Article
- Precision of automated QRS duration measurement in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2018Article
- Reproducibility of global electrical heterogeneity measurements on 12-lead ECG: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.Journal of electrocardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is characterized by delay in depolarization of the right ventricle, detected by prolonged terminal activation duration (TAD) in V1-V3. However, manual ECG measurements have shown moderate-to-low intra- and inter-reader agreement. The goal of this study was to assess reproducibility of automated ECG measurements in the right precordial leads.
methodsPairs of ECGs recorded in the same day from Johns Hopkins ARVD/C Registry participants [n=247, mean age 35.2±15.6 y, 58% men, 92% whites, 11(4.5%) with definite ARVD/C] were retrospectively analyzed. QRS duration, intrinsicoid deflection, TAD, and T-wave amplitude in the right precordial leads, as well as averaged across all leads QRS duration, QRS axis, T axis, QTc interval, and heart rate was measured automatically, using 12SL TM algorithm (GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI, USA). Intrinsicoid deflection was measured as the time from QRS complex onset to the alignment point of the QRS complex. TAD was calculated as the difference between QRS duration and intrinsicoid in V1, V2, V3. Reproducibility was quantified by Bland-Altman analysis (bias with 95% limits of agreement), Lin's concordance coefficient, and Bradley-Blackwood procedure.
resultsBland-Altman analysis revealed satisfactory reproducibility of tested parameters. V1 QRS duration bias was -0.10ms [95% limits of agreement -12.77 to 12.56ms], V2 QRS duration bias -0.09ms [-11.13 to 10.96ms]; V1 TAD bias 0.14ms [-13.23 to 13.51ms], V2 TAD bias 0.008ms [-12.42 to 12.44ms].
conclusionComprehensive statistical evaluation of reproducibility of automated ECG measurements is important for appropriate interpretation of ECG. Automated ECG measurements are reproducible to within 25%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.