ArticleInterventional neurology2014
Stenting and angioplasty of small cerebral arteries in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease.
Article in Interventional neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endovascular stenting for symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis of the anterior and posterior cerebral arteries: a case series.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Undersized angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic intracranial tight stenosis with Enterprise: Evaluation of clinical and vascular outcome.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a common cause of stroke with a poor natural history despite medical therapy. Few studies have investigated endovascular therapies for the treatment of symptomatic ICAD in distal intracranial arteries. Here, we present the feasibility and safety of balloon angioplasty with and without stenting in patients with medically refractory small artery symptomatic ICAD.
methodPersonal logs were reviewed to identify patients who were treated for small artery ICAD (stenosis > 50%) using angioplasty ± stenting. Small cerebral arteries were defined by a diameter ≤ 2 mm or any branch distal to a large intracranial vessel (i.e. distal to ICA, M1, A1, Vertebrobasilar trunk). Patient characteristics, clinical manifestations, treatment, hospital course, and follow up data was collected and analyzed.
resultsTen patients (12 arteries) were treated with either primary balloon angioplasty (58.3%) or angioplasty with stenting (41.6 %) with 100% technical success rate. Mean pre-treatment stenosis was 79.9% while mean post-treatment stenosis was 19.0%. There were no major peri-procedural complications including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or mortality; three cases were complicated by groin hematoma. Patients were followed for a mean total of 18.6 months with only one symptomatic restenosis which was re-treated successfully. All patients had good functional outcome with a mRS of either 0 (80%) or 1 (20%) on follow up.
conclusionIn our case series, treatment of symptomatic small artery ICAD with angioplasty ± stenting was safe and effective. These interventions should be considered as an alternative treatment for ICAD patients refractory to medical therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.