ArticleJournal of biomechanics2014
Predicting surface strains at the human distal radius during an in vivo loading task--finite element model validation and application.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone Adaptation in Adult Women Is Related to Loading Dose: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2020Trial
- Short-term bone formation is greatest within high strain regions of the human distal radius: a prospective pilot study.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2015Trial
- Mechanical Biomarkers in Bone Using Image-Based Finite Element Analysis.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023Review
- Using Finite Element Modeling in Bone Mechanoadaptation.Current osteoporosis reports · 2023Review
- Dominant and nondominant distal radius microstructure: Predictors of asymmetry and effects of a unilateral mechanical loading intervention.Bone reports · 2021Article
- Circum-menarcheal bone acquisition is stress-driven: A longitudinal study in adolescent female gymnasts and non-gymnasts.Journal of biomechanics · 2018Article
- Distal radius microstructure and finite element bone strain are related to site-specific mechanical loading and areal bone mineral density in premenopausal women.Bone reports · 2018Article
- Exercise Early and Often: Effects of Physical Activity and Exercise on Women's Bone Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Review
- Advancing quantitative techniques to improve understanding of the skeletal structure-function relationship.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2018Review
- Validation of a new multiscale finite element analysis approach at the distal radius.Medical engineering & physics · 2017Article
- A cross-sectional study of the effects of load carriage on running characteristics and tibial mechanical stress: implications for stress-fracture injuries in women.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2017Article
- Measurement of Bone: Diagnosis of SCI-Induced Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Prediction.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bone strains resulting from physical activity are thought to be a primary driver of bone adaptation, but cannot be directly noninvasively measured. Because bone adapts nonuniformly, physical activity may make an important independent structural contribution to bone strength that is independent of bone mass and density. Our objective was to create and validate methods for subject-specific finite element (FE) model generation that would accurately predict the surface strains experienced by the distal radius during an in vivo loading task, and to apply these methods to a group of 23 women aged 23-35 to examine variations in strain, bone mass and density, and physical activity. Four cadaveric specimens were experimentally tested and specimen-specific FE models were developed to accurately predict periosteal surface strains (root mean square error=16.3%). In the living subjects, when 300 N load was simulated, mean strains were significantly inversely correlated with BMC (r=-0.893), BMD (r=-0.892) and physical activity level (r=-0.470). Although the group of subjects was relatively homogenous, BMD varied by two-fold (range: 0.19-0.40 g/cm(3)) and mean energy-equivalent strain varied by almost six-fold (range: 226.79-1328.41 με) with a simulated 300 N load. In summary, we have validated methods for estimating surface strains in the distal radius that occur while leaning onto the palm of the hand. In our subjects, strain varied widely across individuals, and was inversely related to bone parameters that can be measured using clinical CT, and inversely related to physical activity history.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.