Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24882740›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2014

Predicting surface strains at the human distal radius during an in vivo loading task--finite element model validation and application.

Varun A Bhatia, W Brent Edwards, Karen L Troy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bone Adaptation in Adult Women Is Related to Loading Dose: A 12-Month Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2020
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exercise Early and Often: Effects of Physical Activity and Exercise on Women's Bone Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Varun A BhatiaDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
W Brent EdwardsHuman Performance Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Karen L TroyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609, United States. Electronic address: ktroy@wpi.edu.

Funding

A prospective study of human bone adaptation using a novel in-vivo loading modelR01AR063691 · NIAMS · WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI TROY, KAREN L · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063691NIAMS NIH HHS R01AR063691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone strains resulting from physical activity are thought to be a primary driver of bone adaptation, but cannot be directly noninvasively measured. Because bone adapts nonuniformly, physical activity may make an important independent structural contribution to bone strength that is independent of bone mass and density. Our objective was to create and validate methods for subject-specific finite element (FE) model generation that would accurately predict the surface strains experienced by the distal radius during an in vivo loading task, and to apply these methods to a group of 23 women aged 23-35 to examine variations in strain, bone mass and density, and physical activity. Four cadaveric specimens were experimentally tested and specimen-specific FE models were developed to accurately predict periosteal surface strains (root mean square error=16.3%). In the living subjects, when 300 N load was simulated, mean strains were significantly inversely correlated with BMC (r=-0.893), BMD (r=-0.892) and physical activity level (r=-0.470). Although the group of subjects was relatively homogenous, BMD varied by two-fold (range: 0.19-0.40 g/cm(3)) and mean energy-equivalent strain varied by almost six-fold (range: 226.79-1328.41 με) with a simulated 300 N load. In summary, we have validated methods for estimating surface strains in the distal radius that occur while leaning onto the palm of the hand. In our subjects, strain varied widely across individuals, and was inversely related to bone parameters that can be measured using clinical CT, and inversely related to physical activity history.

Indexed as

Weight-BearingAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAged, 80 and overBone DensityCadaverFemaleFinite Element AnalysisHumansModels, BiologicalRadiusStress, MechanicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedWrist JointYoung AdultBoneBone adaptationCadaver testingFinite elementHumanPhysical activityStrain gage

Identifiers

PMID24882740
PMCPMC4248607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.