Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24882736›Full record

ArticleBone2014

Megakaryocytes are mechanically responsive and influence osteoblast proliferation and differentiation.

Constance P Soves, Joshua D Miller, Dana L Begun, Russell S Taichman, Kurt D Hankenson, Steven A Goldstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Why platelet mechanotransduction matters for hemostasis and thrombosis.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Mechanobiology of Bone Metastatic Cancer.Current osteoporosis reports · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evidence for shear-mediated CaThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Constance P SovesOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Michigan, Room 2003 Biomedical Sciences Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Joshua D MillerOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Michigan, Room 2003 Biomedical Sciences Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Dana L BegunOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Michigan, Room 2003 Biomedical Sciences Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Russell S TaichmanDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, 1011 North University Ave., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Kurt D HankensonDepartment of Clinical Studies-New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Room 145 Myrin Bldg, Kennett Square PA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA.
Steven A GoldsteinOrthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Michigan, Room 2003 Biomedical Sciences Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: stevegld@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USOrthopaedic Research Laboratories · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Mechanical Factors and Cellular Responsiveness in Fracture RepairR01AR051504 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GOLDSTEIN, STEVEN A · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS 5R01 AR051504NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR051504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of bone mass and geometry is influenced by mechanical stimuli. Paradigms suggest that osteocytes embedded within the mineralized matrix and osteoblasts on the bone surfaces are the primary responders to physical forces. However, other cells within the bone marrow cavity, such as megakaryocytes (MKs), are also subject to mechanical forces. Recent studies have highlighted the potent effects of MKs on osteoblast proliferation as well as bone formation in vivo. We hypothesize that MKs are capable of responding to physical forces and that the interactions between these cells and osteoblasts can be influenced by mechanical stimulation. In this study, we demonstrate that two MK cell lines respond to fluid shear stress in culture. Furthermore, using laser capture microdissection, we isolated MKs from histologic sections of murine tibiae that were exposed to compressive loads in vivo. C-fos, a transcription factor shown to be upregulated in response to load in various tissue types, was increased in MKs from loaded relative to non-loaded limbs at a level comparable to that of osteocytes from the same limbs. We also developed a co-culture system to address whether mechanical stimulation of MKs in culture would impact osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. The presence of MKs in co-culture, but not conditioned media, had dramatic effects on proliferation of preosteoblast MC3T3-E1 cells in culture. Our data suggests a minimal decrease in proliferation as well as an increase in mineralization capacity of osteoblasts co-cultured with MKs exposed to shear compared to co-cultures with unstimulated MKs.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsAnthraquinonesBiomechanical PhenomenaCalcification, PhysiologicCalciumCell ProliferationCoculture TechniquesHumansK562 CellsMegakaryocytesMiceMicrodissectionOsteoblastsOsteocytesShear StrengthalizarinAnthraquinonesCalciumFluid shearLaser capture microdissectionMechanotransductionMegakaryocyte

Identifiers

PMID24882736
PMCPMC4125454
OpenAlexW2069429824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.