Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24881086›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Massive gene transfer and extensive RNA editing of a symbiotic dinoflagellate plastid genome.

Sutada Mungpakdee, Chuya Shinzato, Takeshi Takeuchi, Takeshi Kawashima, Ryo Koyanagi, Kanako Hisata, Makiko Tanaka, Hiroki Goto, Manabu Fujie, Senjie Lin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. RNA-Binding Proteins in Dinoflagellates.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. DNA:RNA Hybrids Are Major Dinoflagellate Minicircle Molecular Types.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. From theFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sutada MungpakdeeMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan msutada@gmail.com eiichi@oist.jp.
Chuya ShinzatoMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Takeshi TakeuchiMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Takeshi KawashimaMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Ryo KoyanagiMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, JapanDNA Sequencing Section, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Kanako HisataMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Makiko TanakaMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Hiroki GotoDNA Sequencing Section, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Manabu FujieDNA Sequencing Section, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Senjie LinDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut.
Nori SatohMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan.
Eiichi ShoguchiMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Japan msutada@gmail.com eiichi@oist.jp.
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome sequencing of Symbiodinium minutum revealed that 95 of 109 plastid-associated genes have been transferred to the nuclear genome and subsequently expanded by gene duplication. Only 14 genes remain in plastids and occur as DNA minicircles. Each minicircle (1.8-3.3 kb) contains one gene and a conserved noncoding region containing putative promoters and RNA-binding sites. Nine types of RNA editing, including a novel G/U type, were discovered in minicircle transcripts but not in genes transferred to the nucleus. In contrast to DNA editing sites in dinoflagellate mitochondria, which tend to be highly conserved across all taxa, editing sites employed in DNA minicircles are highly variable from species to species. Editing is crucial for core photosystem protein function. It restores evolutionarily conserved amino acids and increases peptidyl hydropathy. It also increases protein plasticity necessary to initiate photosystem complex assembly.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAmino Acid SequenceBase SequenceBiological EvolutionDinoflagellidaGenes, ProtozoanGenome, PlastidModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataPlastidsProtein ConformationProtozoan ProteinsRNA, ProtozoanProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Protozoandinoflagellatehydropathylight-harvesting complex proteinsminicirclesplastid-associated genesRNA editingSymbiodinium minutum

Identifiers

PMID24881086
PMCPMC4079212
OpenAlexW2147259208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.