ArticleHaematologica2014
Clinical and genetic predictors of prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes.
Article in Haematologica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Azacitidine with or without lenalidomide in higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome & low blast acute myeloid leukemia.Haematologica · 2019Trial
- Comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors in myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated deletion of chromosome 5q.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of IPSS, IPSS-R, and WPSS for Predicting Survival and Leukemic Transformation in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Real-World Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- STAT signaling in the pathogenesis and therapy of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Unveiling Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Exploring Pathogenic Mechanisms and Therapeutic Advances.Cancers · 2025Review
- The immunoregulatory role of monocytes and thrombomodulin in myelodysplastic neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Understanding iron homeostasis in MDS: the role of erythroferrone.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Targeted NGS on sequential bone marrow biopsies aids in the evaluation of cytopenias and monocytosis and documents clonal evolution-a proof of principle study.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Article
- The Evolving Landscape: Exploring the Future of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Treatment with Dr. Rami Komrokji.Cancers · 2023Article
- Assessment and validation of the molecular international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes.Leukemia · 2023Article
- Clinical and Genomic Profiles of Korean Patients withAnnals of laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- Utility of plasma cell-free DNA forHaematologica · 2022Article
- Circulating tumor DNA: a noninvasive biomarker for tracking ovarian cancer.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2021Review
- Molecular Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the Postgenomic Era and Future Perspectives for Precision Medicine.Cancers · 2021Review
- Somatic mosaicism in inherited bone marrow failure syndromes.Best practice & research. Clinical haematology · 2021Review
- Induced pluripotent stem cell models of myeloid malignancies and clonal evolution.Stem cell research · 2021Review
- Review
- Comprehensive Gene Mutation Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA in Ovarian Cancer: Its Pathological and Prognostic Impact.Cancers · 2020Article
- Following in the footsteps of acute myeloid leukemia: are we witnessing the start of a therapeutic revolution for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes?Leukemia & lymphoma · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes are a collection of clonal hematopoietic disorders with a wide range of clinical manifestations and eventual outcomes. Accurate prediction of a patient's prognosis is useful to define the risk posed by the disease and which treatment options are most appropriate. Several models have been created to help predict the prognosis for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. The International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) has been the standard tool used to risk stratify MDS patients since its publication in 1997. Other models have since been created to improve upon the IPSS, including the recent Revised International Prognostic Scoring System. Most models include the presence or severity of peripheral blood cytopenias, the proportion of bone marrow blasts, and specific karyotype abnormalities. Other factors including age, performance status, co-morbidities, transfusion dependence, and molecular biomarkers can further refine the prediction of prognosis in some models. Novel, disease specific biomarkers with prognostic value in myelodysplastic syndromes including cell surface markers, gene expression profiles, and high resolution copy number analyses have been proposed but not yet adopted clinically. Somatic abnormalities in recurrently mutated genes are the most informative prognostic biomarkers not currently considered by clinical risk models. Mutations in specific genes have independent prognostic significance and, unlike cytogenetic abnormalities, are present in the majority of myelodysplastic syndrome cases. However, mutational information can be complex and there are challenges to its clinical implementation. Despite these limitations, DNA sequencing can refine the prediction of prognosis for myelodysplastic syndrome patients and has become increasingly available in the clinic where it will help improve the care of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.