Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24881027›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2014

Silk as a biocohesive sacrificial binder in the fabrication of hydroxyapatite load bearing scaffolds.

Stephanie L McNamara, Jelena Rnjak-Kovacina, Daniel F Schmidt, Tim J Lo, David L Kaplan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair.Military Medical Research · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie L McNamaraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Jelena Rnjak-KovacinaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA; Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering, UNSW Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Daniel F SchmidtDepartment of Plastics Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA.
Tim J LoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
David L KaplanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA. Electronic address: David.Kaplan@Tufts.edu.

Funding

Translational Bioreactors - Engineering Complex TissuesP41EB002520 · NIBIB · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2004 to 2018
$16.7M
Craniofacial Tissue EngineeringR01DE016525 · NIDCR · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI VUNJAK-NOVAKOVIC, GORDANA · 2005 to 2017
$5.5M
Silica-protein Nanocomposites for Dental RepairR01DE017207 · NIDCR · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI KAPLAN, DAVID L. · 2007 to 2016
$3.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB002520NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002520NIDCR NIH HHS 2R01DE016525-06A1NIDCR NIH HHS DE017207NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE016525NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Limitations of current clinical methods for bone repair continue to fuel the demand for a high strength, bioactive bone replacement material. Recent attempts to produce porous scaffolds for bone regeneration have been limited by the intrinsic weakness associated with high porosity materials. In this study, ceramic scaffold fabrication techniques for potential use in load-bearing bone repairs have been developed using naturally derived silk from Bombyx mori. Silk was first employed for ceramic grain consolidation during green body formation, and later as a sacrificial polymer to impart porosity during sintering. These techniques allowed preparation of hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds that exhibited a wide range of mechanical and porosity profiles, with some displaying unusually high compressive strength up to 152.4 ± 9.1 MPa. Results showed that the scaffolds exhibited a wide range of compressive strengths and moduli (8.7 ± 2.7 MPa to 152.4 ± 9.1 MPa and 0.3 ± 0.1 GPa to 8.6 ± 0.3 GPa) with total porosities of up to 62.9 ± 2.7% depending on the parameters used for fabrication. Moreover, HA-silk scaffolds could be molded into large, complex shapes, and further machined post-sinter to generate specific three-dimensional geometries. Scaffolds supported bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell attachment and proliferation, with no signs of cytotoxicity. Therefore, silk-fabricated HA scaffolds show promise for load bearing bone repair and regeneration needs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBombyxBone Marrow CellsBone SubstitutesCell AdhesionCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCeramicsDurapatiteHumansMaleMaterials TestingMesenchymal Stem CellsMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningBone SubstitutesDurapatiteSilkBone tissue engineeringCeramic structureHydroxyapatitePorositySilk

Identifiers

PMID24881027
PMCPMC4103993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.