Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24880990›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2014

Comparison of posterior capsule opacification in rabbit eyes receiving different administrations of rapamycin.

Hongling Liu, Yanyan Zhang, Haiyan Ma, Chunmei Zhang, Shaoying Fu

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hongling LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Str, Nangang District, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, 150001, People's Republic of China.
Yanyan Zhang
Haiyan Ma
Chunmei Zhang
Shaoying Fu
Harbin Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosterior capsule opacification (PCO) is a common complication after cataract surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of three administering ways of rapamycin (RAPA) on the formation of PCO in rabbit eyes for 12 weeks.

methodsEighty rabbits were divided into four groups, according to the different administrations of RAPA which they received. These were: (1) the control group, (2) the irrigation-treated group - 5 ng/ml intraoperative RAPA irrigation solution, (3) the eye-drop-treated group - 2 mg/ml RAPA eye drops, and (4) the IOL-treated group - RAPA-poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) loaded on the surface of intraocular lens (IOLs) (RAPA-PLGA-IOLs). All right eyes were treated with lens extraction plus IOL implantation, receiving relative administrations of RAPA. RAPA concentrations in the aqueous humour were determined by high performance of liquid chromatography (HPLC). The anterior chamber (AC) response was observed through slit-lamp biomicroscopy. After 12 weeks, the degree of PCO was determined by clinical evaluation. The histological sections, immunohistochemistry expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in the lens capsule were conducted.

resultsIn the early period, AC response for both experimental and control eyes were similar. In the IOL-treated group, RAPA reached its peak at 25.68 ± 0.74 μg/ml on the 4th day, and it was detectable until 8 weeks afterwards. However, in the other groups, RAPA could not be detected all the time. Compared with other groups, in the IOL-treated group, PCO was greatly alleviated; only a few layers of the lens epithelial cells (LECs) and a little proliferative material around the posterior capsules, and a significantly weak expression of PCNA in the nuclei of LECs. By contrast, there was no significant statistical difference in eye-drop-treated or irrigation-treated eyes and control eyes respectively.

conclusionsIntraocular RAPA-PLGA-IOL was a promising, effective, and safe administration to prevent PCO compared with other methods in the rabbit PCO model.

Indexed as

AnimalsAqueous HumorBiomarkersCapsule OpacificationImmunoenzyme TechniquesImmunosuppressive AgentsLens Implantation, IntraocularOphthalmic SolutionsPhacoemulsificationPosterior Capsule of the LensPostoperative ComplicationsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenRabbitsSirolimusBiomarkersImmunosuppressive AgentsOphthalmic SolutionsProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID24880990
OpenAlexW1978325481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.