Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24880630›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2014

Genomic and protein expression analysis reveals flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1) as a key biomarker in breast and ovarian cancer.

Tarek M A Abdel-Fatah, Roslin Russell, Nada Albarakati, David J Maloney, Dorjbal Dorjsuren, Oscar M Rueda, Paul Moseley, Vivek Mohan, Hongmao Sun, Rachel Abbotts and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Transcription-Replication Conflicts: Unlocking New Frontiers in Cancer.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. PDPNCell death & disease · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Role of Protein Arginine Methyltransferases in DNA Damage Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tarek M A Abdel-FatahDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG51PB, UK.
Roslin RussellDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, UK; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
Nada AlbarakatiAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG51PB, UK.
David J MaloneyNIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9800 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Dorjbal DorjsurenNIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9800 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Oscar M RuedaDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, UK; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
Paul MoseleyDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG51PB, UK.
Vivek MohanAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG51PB, UK.
Hongmao SunNIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9800 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Rachel AbbottsAcademic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG51PB, UK.
Abhik MukherjeeDepartment of Pathology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG51PB, UK.
Devika AgarwalSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Jennifer L IlluzziLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, Biomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825, USA.
Ajit JadhavNIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9800 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Anton SimeonovNIH Chemical Genomics Center, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 9800 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Graham BallSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Stephen ChanDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG51PB, UK.
Carlos CaldasDepartment of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XZ, UK; Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK.
Ian O EllisSchool of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
David M WilsonLaboratory of Molecular Gerontology, Biomedical Research Center, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825, USA.
Srinivasan MadhusudanDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG51PB, UK; Academic Unit of Oncology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG51PB, UK. Electronic address: srinivasan.madhusudan@nottingham.ac.uk.
National Institutes of Health · USNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBNottingham Trent University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

NIH Chemical Genomics CenterZIBTR000004 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI MCKEW, JOHN · 2012 to 2014
$52.3M
NIH Chemical Genomics CenterZIAHG200319 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER P · 2009 to 2009
$19.9M
Base Excision DNA Repair in Disease Susceptibility and TreatmentZIAAG000750 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI BOHR, VILHELM A · 2009 to 2019
$5.4M
Human FEN1 (Flap structure-specific endonuclease1)ZIATR000134 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI SIMEONOV, ANTON · 2015 to 2016
$179k
Cancer Research UK 16942Intramural NIH HHS ZIA HG200319NIMH NIH HHS 1 R03 MH092154-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FEN1 has key roles in Okazaki fragment maturation during replication, long patch base excision repair, rescue of stalled replication forks, maintenance of telomere stability and apoptosis. FEN1 may be dysregulated in breast and ovarian cancers and have clinicopathological significance in patients. We comprehensively investigated FEN1 mRNA expression in multiple cohorts of breast cancer [training set (128), test set (249), external validation (1952)]. FEN1 protein expression was evaluated in 568 oestrogen receptor (ER) negative breast cancers, 894 ER positive breast cancers and 156 ovarian epithelial cancers. FEN1 mRNA overexpression was highly significantly associated with high grade (p = 4.89 × 10(-57)), high mitotic index (p = 5.25 × 10(-28)), pleomorphism (p = 6.31 × 10(-19)), ER negative (p = 9.02 × 10(-35)), PR negative (p = 9.24 × 10(-24)), triple negative phenotype (p = 6.67 × 10(-21)), PAM50.Her2 (p = 5.19 × 10(-13)), PAM50. Basal (p = 2.7 × 10(-41)), PAM50.LumB (p = 1.56 × 10(-26)), integrative molecular cluster 1 (intClust.1) (p = 7.47 × 10(-12)), intClust.5 (p = 4.05 × 10(-12)) and intClust. 10 (p = 7.59 × 10(-38)) breast cancers. FEN1 mRNA overexpression is associated with poor breast cancer specific survival in univariate (p = 4.4 × 10(-16)) and multivariate analysis (p = 9.19 × 10(-7)). At the protein level, in ER positive tumours, FEN1 overexpression remains significantly linked to high grade, high mitotic index and pleomorphism (ps < 0.01). In ER negative tumours, high FEN1 is significantly associated with pleomorphism, tumour type, lymphovascular invasion, triple negative phenotype, EGFR and HER2 expression (ps < 0.05). In ER positive as well as in ER negative tumours, FEN1 protein overexpression is associated with poor survival in univariate and multivariate analysis (ps < 0.01). In ovarian epithelial cancers, similarly, FEN1 overexpression is associated with high grade, high stage and poor survival (ps < 0.05). We conclude that FEN1 is a promising biomarker in breast and ovarian epithelial cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleFlap EndonucleasesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsOvaryPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorFEN1 protein, humanFlap EndonucleasesBreast cancerDrug targetFEN1Predictive factorPrognostic factor

Identifiers

PMID24880630
PMCPMC4690463
OpenAlexW2162451014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.