SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
Diagnostic value of microRNA-21 in the diagnosis of lung cancer: evidence from a meta-analysis involving 11 studies.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic value of circulating miR-21: An update meta-analysis in various cancers and validation in endometrial cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Pooled it
- Circulating MicroRNA as Potential Source for Neurodegenerative Diseases Biomarkers.Molecular neurobiology · 2015Pooled it
- Circulating microRNA-21 as a biomarker for the detection of various carcinomas: an updated meta-analysis based on 36 studies.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Pooled it
- The clinical utility of microRNA-21 as novel biomarker for diagnosing human cancers.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Unraveling Therapeutic Opportunities and the Diagnostic Potential of microRNAs for Human Lung Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Association between microRNA 21 expression in serum and lung cancer: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Article
- Multidimensional communication of microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs in lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019Review
- Article
- MicroRNA-21: A promising biomarker for the prognosis and diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2018Review
- Methylation and expression of RECK, P53 and RUNX genes in patients with esophageal cancer.Oncology letters · 2017Article
- Effects of microRNA-21 on the biological functions of T-cell acute lymphoblastic lymphoma/leukemia.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- Considering Exosomal miR-21 as a Biomarker for Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2016Review
- Circulating microRNA signature as liquid-biopsy to monitor lung cancer in low-dose computed tomography screening.Oncotarget · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular biomarkers that can be detected in easily accessible body fluids have been proposed as non-invasive, cost-effective, and useful tools for cancer diagnosis. Recently, extensive research has explored the involvement of the aberrant expression of microRNA-21 (miRNA-21, miR-21) in lung cancer. Inconsistent results, however, have prevented its widespread use in diagnosis. In light of this situation, our meta-analysis aimed to systematically determine whether aberrant miR-21 expression can distinguish patients with lung cancer from cancer-free controls with a high level of diagnostic accuracy. A comprehensive literature search for relevant studies published before December 23, 2013 was conducted in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and three Chinese databases. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and other parameters were used to assess the overall performance of miR-21-based assays. Statistical analysis was conducted using the STATA 11.0 software. Eleven research articles involving 676 patients with lung cancer and 529 healthy controls were considered eligible for inclusion in the present meta-analysis. The following summary parameters were calculated from all the included studies: sensitivity of 0.66 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.57-0.74), specificity of 0.82 (95 % CI: 0.74-0.88), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) of 3.70 (95 % CI: 2.50-5.60), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) of 0.42 (95 % CI: 0.32-0.54); diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 9.00 (95 % CI: 5.00-16.00), and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.77-0.84). In addition, we added two pre-specified covariates (ethnicity and specimen types) to the bivariate model to assess their impact on the diagnostic value of miR-21 for lung cancer. Similar results were also observed in subgroup analyses, indicating a relatively low level of accuracy. The current meta-analysis indicates that a single miR-21 may not be sufficient to identify lung cancer and that more miRNAs should be used to detect lung carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.