Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24880487›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2014

A community effort to assess and improve drug sensitivity prediction algorithms.

James C Costello, Laura M Heiser, Elisabeth Georgii, Mehmet Gönen, Michael P Menden, Nicholas J Wang, Mukesh Bansal, Muhammad Ammad-ud-din, Petteri Hintsanen, Suleiman A Khan and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 408 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
408citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

408 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Integrating multi-omics data for next-generation cancer research and precision medicine.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Topology-Aware Deep Learning on Higher-Order Structures for Drug Response Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

348 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

James C Costello1] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] [4].
Laura M Heiser1] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. [2].
Elisabeth Georgii1] Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Information and Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland. [2].
Mehmet GönenHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Information and Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Michael P MendenEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Nicholas J WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Mukesh BansalDepartment of Systems Biology, Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000000314816767
Muhammad Ammad-ud-dinHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Information and Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Petteri HintsanenInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Suleiman A KhanHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Information and Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000000208234042
John-Patrick MpindiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Olli KallioniemiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000000232310332
Antti HonkelaHelsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tero AittokallioInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Krister WennerbergInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
NCI DREAM Community
James J Collins1] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [2] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [3] Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dan GallahanNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Dinah SingerNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Julio Saez-RodriguezEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Samuel Kaski1] Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Information and Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland. [2] Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Joe W GrayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000000192256756
Gustavo StolovitzkyIBM T.J. Watson Research Center, IBM, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Nation Center: Multi-Scale Study- Cellular Networks(RMI)U54CA121852 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA · 2005 to 2015
$37.4M
Tissue and Outcomes CoreP50CA058207 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 1992 to 2012
$32.7M
Systems-Based Predictions of Responses to Cancer TherapyU54CA112970 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI GRAY, JOE W. · 2004 to 2014
$27.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS 5U54CA121852-08NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058207NCI NIH HHS U54 CA 112970NCI NIH HHS U54 CA112970NCI NIH HHS U54 CA121852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the best treatment strategy from genomic information is a core goal of precision medicine. Here we focus on predicting drug response based on a cohort of genomic, epigenomic and proteomic profiling data sets measured in human breast cancer cell lines. Through a collaborative effort between the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods (DREAM) project, we analyzed a total of 44 drug sensitivity prediction algorithms. The top-performing approaches modeled nonlinear relationships and incorporated biological pathway information. We found that gene expression microarrays consistently provided the best predictive power of the individual profiling data sets; however, performance was increased by including multiple, independent data sets. We discuss the innovations underlying the top-performing methodology, Bayesian multitask MKL, and we provide detailed descriptions of all methods. This study establishes benchmarks for drug sensitivity prediction and identifies approaches that can be leveraged for the development of new methods.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAlgorithmsAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpigenomicsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansNeoplasmsProteomicsAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID24880487
PMCPMC4547623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.