ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2014
Ethical conduct of palliative care research: enhancing communication between investigators and institutional review boards.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bicentre, randomized, parallel-arm, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of palliative care patients with refractory cancer pain.BMC palliative care · 2023Trial
- The Relationship of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder to End-of-life Care Received by Dying Veterans: a Secondary Data Analysis.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Trial
- Intersectionality-Informed HIV Cure-Related Research at the End of Life: A Call to Action.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Making space for palliative care: Built environments and social practices in a novel, non-clinical respite setting.Palliative care and social practice · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Opioid Management of Dyspnea in Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2025Review
- Nurses' perception of thirst in patients within palliative home care: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Feasibility, use and benefits of patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care units: a multicentre observational study.BMC palliative care · 2023Observational
- Association between the Development of Hospice and Palliative Care and Government-Funded Research Priority: Taiwan-Based Example.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- When Should Neuroendovascular Care for Patients With Acute Stroke Be Palliative?AMA journal of ethics · 2021Article
- Methodological challenges in conducting instrumentation research in non-communicative palliative care patients.Applied nursing research : ANR · 2020Article
- Dying persons' perspectives on, or experiences of, participating in research: An integrative review.Palliative medicine · 2018Review
- Reality of evidence-based practice in palliative care.Cancer biology & medicine · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Palliative care has faced moral and ethical challenges when conducting research involving human subjects. There are currently no resources to guide institutional review boards (IRBs) in applying standard ethical principles and terms-in a specific way-to palliative care research. Using as a case study a recently completed multisite palliative care clinical trial, this article provides guidance and recommendations for both IRBs and palliative care investigators to facilitate communication and attain the goal of conducting ethical palliative care research and protecting study participants while advancing the science. Beyond identifying current challenges faced by palliative care researchers and IRBs reviewing palliative care research, this article suggests steps that the palliative care research community can take to establish a scientifically sound, stable, productive, and well-functioning relationship between palliative care investigators and the ethical bodies that oversee their work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.