Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24879895›Full record

ArticleFEBS letters2014

PEX14 binding to Arabidopsis PEX5 has differential effects on PTS1 and PTS2 cargo occupancy of the receptor.

Thomas Lanyon-Hogg, Jacob Hooper, Sarah Gunn, Stuart L Warriner, Alison Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Peroxisome protein import: a complex journey.Biochemical Society transactions · 2016
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas Lanyon-HoggCentre for Plant Sciences, Irene Manton Building, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Jacob HooperSchool of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Sarah GunnCentre for Plant Sciences, Irene Manton Building, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Stuart L WarrinerSchool of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Alison BakerCentre for Plant Sciences, Irene Manton Building, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK. Electronic address: a.baker@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E013740/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PEX5 acts as a cycling receptor for import of PTS1 proteins into peroxisomes and as a co-receptor for PEX7, the PTS2 receptor, but the mechanism of cargo unloading has remained obscure. Using recombinant protein domains we show PEX5 binding to the PEX14N-terminal domain (PEX14N) has no effect on the affinity of PEX5 for a PTS1 containing peptide. PEX5 can form a complex containing both recombinant PTS1 cargo and endogenous PEX7-thiolase simultaneously but isolation of the complex via the PEX14 construct resulted in an absence of thiolase, suggesting a possible role for PEX14 in the unloading of PTS2 cargos.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsKineticsMembrane ProteinsPeroxisomal Targeting Signal 2 ReceptorPeroxisome-Targeting Signal 1 ReceptorProtein BindingProtein TransportReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRepressor ProteinsArabidopsis ProteinsMembrane ProteinsPeroxisomal Targeting Signal 2 ReceptorPeroxisome-Targeting Signal 1 ReceptorPEX14 protein, ArabidopsisPEX5 protein, ArabidopsisPEX7 protein, ArabidopsisReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearRepressor ProteinsArabidopsis thalianaCargo unloadingPeroxisomePEX14PEX5PEX7PTS1PTS2

Identifiers

PMID24879895
PMCPMC4065332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.