Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24879874›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2014

Nociceptive primary afferents: they have a mind of their own.

Susan M Carlton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neuronal-Immune Cell Units in Allergic Inflammation in the Nose.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Renal Nerve Ablation in Nephritis and Beyond.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neurogenic tachykinin mechanisms in experimental nephritis of rats.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Central processing of afferent renal pathways-significance and implications.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Susan M CarltonDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77554, USA smcarlto@utmb.edu.

Funding

PERIPHERAL GLUTAMATE RECEPTORS IN INFLAMMATORY PAINR01NS027910 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI CARLTON, SUSAN M · 1995 to 2013
$3.8M
Peripheral Sensitization Following Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS054765 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI CARLTON, SUSAN M · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS027910NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nociceptive primary afferents have three surprising properties: they are highly complex in their expression of neurotransmitters and receptors and most probably participate in autocrine and paracrine interactions; they are capable of exerting tonic and activity-dependent inhibitory control over incoming nociceptive input; they can generate signals in the form of dorsal root reflexes that are transmitted antidromically out to the periphery and these signals can result in neurogenic inflammation in the innervated tissue. Thus, nociceptive primary afferents are highly complicated structures, capable of modifying input before it is ever transmitted to the central nervous system and capable of altering the tissue they innervate.

Indexed as

Synaptic TransmissionAnimalsGanglia, SpinalHumansNeurotransmitter AgentsNociceptorsReflexNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID24879874
PMCPMC4229338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.