ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2014
Novel assessment tools for osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Added Value of Impact Microindentation in the Evaluation of Bone Fragility: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Pooled it
- Bone mineral density, prolactin, estradiol, testosterone levels and related research in male chronic patients with schizophrenia.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Application of Advanced Bone Imaging Technologies in Sports Medicine.Radiology research and practice · 2023Review
- Multiscale Femoral Neck Imaging and Multimodal Trabeculae Quality Characterization in an Osteoporotic Bone Sample.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Altered levels of BMD, PRL, BAP and TRACP-5b in male chronic patients with schizophrenia.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2019Review
- Osteoporosis: what the clinician needs to know?Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018Review
- What is changed in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: the role of radiologists.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018Article
- Vibrational spectroscopic techniques to assess bone quality.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This review describes new technologies for the diagnosis and treatment, including fracture risk prediction, of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Four promising technologies and their potential for clinical translation and basic science studies are discussed. These include reference point indentation (RPI), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Raman spectroscopy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). While each modality exploits different physical principles, the commonality is that none of them require use of ionizing radiation. To provide context for the new developments, brief summaries are provided for the current state of biomarker assays, fracture risk assessment (FRAX), and other fracture risk prediction algorithms and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.