Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24879432›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Efficient purging of deleterious mutations in plants with haploid selfing.

Péter Szövényi, Nicolas Devos, David J Weston, Xiaohan Yang, Zsófia Hock, Jonathan A Shaw, Kentaro K Shimizu, Stuart F McDaniel, Andreas Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Features of Parthenogenetic Animals.The Journal of heredity · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Péter SzövényiInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, SwitzerlandInstitute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, SwitzerlandSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Quartier Sorge-Batiment Genopode, Lausanne, SwitzerlandMTA-ELTE-MTM Ecology Research Group, ELTE, Biological Institute, Hungary peter.szoevenyi@uzh.ch.
Nicolas DevosDepartment of Biology, Duke University.
David J WestonBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Xiaohan YangBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
Zsófia HockInstitute of Systematic Botany, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Jonathan A ShawDepartment of Biology, Duke University.
Kentaro K ShimizuInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Stuart F McDanielBiology Department, University of Florida.
Andreas WagnerInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, SwitzerlandSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Quartier Sorge-Batiment Genopode, Lausanne, SwitzerlandBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), SingaporeThe Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe NM.
Duke University · USOak Ridge National Laboratory · USUniversity of Zurich · CHSanta Fe Institute · USSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In diploid organisms, selfing reduces the efficiency of selection in removing deleterious mutations from a population. This need not be the case for all organisms. Some plants, for example, undergo an extreme form of selfing known as intragametophytic selfing, which immediately exposes all recessive deleterious mutations in a parental genome to selective purging. Here, we ask how effectively deleterious mutations are removed from such plants. Specifically, we study the extent to which deleterious mutations accumulate in a predominantly selfing and a predominantly outcrossing pair of moss species, using genome-wide transcriptome data. We find that the selfing species purge significantly more nonsynonymous mutations, as well as a greater proportion of radical amino acid changes which alter physicochemical properties of amino acids. Moreover, their purging of deleterious mutation is especially strong in conserved regions of protein-coding genes. Our observations show that selfing need not impede but can even accelerate the removal of deleterious mutations, and do so on a genome-wide scale.

Indexed as

HaploidyMutationBase SequenceBiological EvolutionBryophytaConserved SequenceDiploidyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPollinationSelection, GeneticSelf-FertilizationTranscriptomedeleterious mutationsdiploidhaploidhaploid-dominant life cyclehigh throughput sequencingintragametophytic selfingoutcrossing

Identifiers

PMID24879432
PMCPMC4041004
OpenAlexW2133501432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.