ArticleSurgical endoscopy2014
Efficacy and durability of robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia: patient symptoms and satisfaction at long-term follow-up.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic heller myotomy for esophageal achalasia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations.United European gastroenterology journal · 2020Guideline
- Robotic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia: A Narrative Review of the State-of-the-Art Technique and Its Future Directions.Cureus · 2025Review
- The impact of robotic surgery on the treatment of benign esophageal and gastric disease: early experience of a specialized unit.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Robotic Heller's cardiomyotomy for achalasia: early outcomes for a high-volume UK centre.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2024Article
- Robotic Heller's myotomy using the new Hugo™ RAS system: first worldwide report.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Single-center experience of transitioning from video-assisted laparoscopic to robotic Heller myotomy with Dor fundoplication for esophageal motility disorders.BMC surgery · 2023Observational
- Robot-Assisted Heller Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2023Review
- Clinical and functional outcome following robotic Heller-myotomy with partial fundoplication in patients with achalasia.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication: Twelve steps.JTCVS techniques · 2022Article
- From laparoscopic to robotic-assisted Heller myotomy for achalasia in a single high-volume visceral surgery center: postoperative outcomes and quality of life.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- Heller myotomy perforation: robotic visualization decreases perforation rate and revisional surgery is a perforation risk.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Article
- The Evolution of the Treatment of Esophageal Achalasia: From the Open to the Minimally Invasive Approach.World journal of surgery · 2022Review
- Clinical and pathophysiological outcomes of the robotic-assisted Heller-Dor myotomy for achalasia: a single-center experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2020Article
- [Challenging achalasia therapy : Against POEM too early, against balloon dilatation overdue].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017Article
- Robotic-assisted Heller myotomy: a modern technique and review of outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2015Review
- The choice of myotomy in achalasia cardia: Heller's or per-oral endoscopic myotomy.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has become the standard treatment for achalasia in the USA. Robot-assisted Heller myotomy (RHM) has emerged as an alternative approach due to improved visualization and fine motor control, but long-term follow-up studies have not been reported. We sought to report the long-term outcomes of RHM and compare them to those of LHM.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent laparoscopic or RHM between 1995 and 2006. Long-term follow-up was performed via mail or telephone questionnaire. The primary outcome measure was durable relief of dysphagia without need for further intervention. Secondary outcomes included gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, disease-specific quality of life, and patient satisfaction with their operation.
resultsSeventy-five patients underwent laparoscopic (n = 19) or robotic (n = 56) myotomy during the study period. Long-term follow-up was obtained in 53 (71 %) patients with a median interval of 9 years. RHM was associated with a decreased mucosal injury rate (0 vs. 16 %, p = 0.01) and median hospital stay (1 vs. 2 days, p < 0.01) compared to conventional laparoscopy. All patients reported initial dysphagia relief, and 80 % required no further intervention. This did not differ between groups. Sixty-two percent required medications to control reflux symptoms at long-term follow-up, including 56 % following robotic myotomy and 80 % after laparoscopic myotomy (p = 0.27). Overall, 95 % of patients were satisfied with their operation, and 91 % would choose surgery again given the benefit of hindsight.
conclusionThere is a dearth of long-term follow-up data to support the effectiveness of RHM. This study demonstrates durable dysphagia relief in the vast majority of patients with a high degree of patient satisfaction and a low rate of esophageal mucosal injury. While a significant proportion of patients report reflux symptoms, these symptoms are well controlled with medical acid suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24879141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.