Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24878745›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2014

Learning to eat vegetables in early life: the role of timing, age and individual eating traits.

Samantha J Caton, Pam Blundell, Sara M Ahern, Chandani Nekitsing, Annemarie Olsen, Per Møller, Helene Hausner, Eloïse Remy, Sophie Nicklaus, Claire Chabanet and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Samantha J CatonInstitute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Pam BlundellInstitute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Sara M AhernInstitute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Chandani NekitsingInstitute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Annemarie OlsenDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per MøllerDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helene HausnerDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eloïse RemyCNRS, UMR6265, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France; INRA, UMR1324, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France; Université de Bourgogne, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France.
Sophie NicklausCNRS, UMR6265, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France; INRA, UMR1324, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France; Université de Bourgogne, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France.
Claire ChabanetCNRS, UMR6265, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France; INRA, UMR1324, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France; Université de Bourgogne, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France.
Sylvie IssanchouCNRS, UMR6265, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France; INRA, UMR1324, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France; Université de Bourgogne, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Dijon, France.
Marion M HetheringtonInstitute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
University of Leeds · GBCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation · FRUniversity of Copenhagen · DKCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vegetable intake is generally low among children, who appear to be especially fussy during the pre-school years. Repeated exposure is known to enhance intake of a novel vegetable in early life but individual differences in response to familiarisation have emerged from recent studies. In order to understand the factors which predict different responses to repeated exposure, data from the same experiment conducted in three groups of children from three countries (n = 332) aged 4-38 m (18.9±9.9 m) were combined and modelled. During the intervention period each child was given between 5 and 10 exposures to a novel vegetable (artichoke puree) in one of three versions (basic, sweet or added energy). Intake of basic artichoke puree was measured both before and after the exposure period. Overall, younger children consumed more artichoke than older children. Four distinct patterns of eating behaviour during the exposure period were defined. Most children were "learners" (40%) who increased intake over time. 21% consumed more than 75% of what was offered each time and were labelled "plate-clearers". 16% were considered "non-eaters" eating less than 10 g by the 5th exposure and the remainder were classified as "others" (23%) since their pattern was highly variable. Age was a significant predictor of eating pattern, with older pre-school children more likely to be non-eaters. Plate-clearers had higher enjoyment of food and lower satiety responsiveness than non-eaters who scored highest on food fussiness. Children in the added energy condition showed the smallest change in intake over time, compared to those in the basic or sweetened artichoke condition. Clearly whilst repeated exposure familiarises children with a novel food, alternative strategies that focus on encouraging initial tastes of the target food might be needed for the fussier and older pre-school children.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorLearningVegetablesAge FactorsChild, PreschoolFemaleFood PreferencesHumansInfantMaleTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID24878745
PMCPMC4039444
OpenAlexW2059984341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.