ArticleMedical physics2014
Fiducial marker-based correction for involuntary motion in weight-bearing C-arm CT scanning of knees. II. Experiment.
Article in Medical physics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiable Forward and Back-Projector for Rigid Motion Estimation in X-Ray Imaging.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- A synergistic framework for geometric calibration and reconstruction in dual-arm robotic cone-beam computed tomography.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Joint Cone-Beam CT Reconstruction and Rigid Motion Compensation Using A Differentiable Projector.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based cone-beam CT motion compensation with single-view temporal resolution.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Fully automatic online geometric calibration for non-circular cone-beam CT orbits using fiducials with unknown placement.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Reference-free learning-based similarity metric for motion compensation in cone-beam CT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Practical workflow for arbitrary non-circular orbits for CT with clinical robotic C-arms.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2022Article
- Rigid and Non-Rigid Motion Compensation in Weight-Bearing CBCT of the Knee Using Simulated Inertial Measurements.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
- Validation of watershed-based segmentation of the cartilage surface from sequential CT arthrography scans.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- 3D Non-Rigid Alignment of Low-Dose Scans Allows to Correct for Saturation in Lower Extremity Cone-Beam CT.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021Article
- Motion compensation in extremity cone-beam computed tomography.Skeletal radiology · 2019Article
- Next-generation imaging of the skeletal system and its blood supply.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2019Review
- Motion compensation for cone-beam CT using Fourier consistency conditions.Physics in medicine and biology · 2017Article
- Comparison of Different Approaches for Measuring Tibial Cartilage Thickness.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Motion compensation in extremity cone-beam CT using a penalized image sharpness criterion.Physics in medicine and biology · 2017Article
- Marker-free motion correction in weight-bearing cone-beam CT of the knee joint.Medical physics · 2016Article
- Image-Based Motion Compensation for High-Resolution Extremities Cone-Beam CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2016Article
- Kinect-Based Correction of Overexposure Artifacts in Knee Imaging with C-Arm CT Systems.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2016Article
- Practical dose point-based methods to characterize dose distribution in a stationary elliptical body phantom for a cone-beam C-arm CT system.Medical physics · 2015Article
- Dynamic detector offsets for field of view extension in C-arm computed tomography with application to weight-bearing imaging.Medical physics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA C-arm CT system has been shown to be capable of scanning a single cadaver leg under loaded conditions by virtue of its highly flexible acquisition trajectories. In Part I of this study, using the 4D XCAT-based numerical simulation, the authors predicted that the involuntary motion in the lower body of subjects in weight-bearing positions would seriously degrade image quality and the authors suggested three motion compensation methods by which the reconstructions could be corrected to provide diagnostic image quality. Here, the authors demonstrate that a flat-panel angiography system is appropriate for scanning both legs of subjects in vivo under weight-bearing conditions and further evaluate the three motion-correction algorithms using in vivo data.
methodsThe geometry of a C-arm CT system for a horizontal scan trajectory was calibrated using the PDS-2 phantom. The authors acquired images of two healthy volunteers while lying supine on a table, standing, and squatting at several knee flexion angles. In order to identify the involuntary motion of the lower body, nine 1-mm-diameter tantalum fiducial markers were attached around the knee. The static mean marker position in 3D, a reference for motion compensation, was estimated by back-projecting detected markers in multiple projections using calibrated projection matrices and identifying the intersection points in 3D of the back-projected rays. Motion was corrected using three different methods (described in detail previously): (1) 2D projection shifting, (2) 2D deformable projection warping, and (3) 3D rigid body warping. For quantitative image quality analysis, SSIM indices for the three methods were compared using the supine data as a ground truth.
resultsA 2D Euclidean distance-based metric of subjects' motion ranged from 0.85 mm (±0.49 mm) to 3.82 mm (±2.91 mm) (corresponding to 2.76 to 12.41 pixels) resulting in severe motion artifacts in 3D reconstructions. Shifting in 2D, 2D warping, and 3D warping improved the SSIM in the central slice by 20.22%, 16.83%, and 25.77% in the data with the largest motion among the five datasets (SCAN5); improvement in off-center slices was 18.94%, 29.14%, and 36.08%, respectively.
conclusionsThe authors showed that C-arm CT control can be implemented for nonstandard horizontal trajectories which enabled us to scan and successfully reconstruct both legs of volunteers in weight-bearing positions. As predicted using theoretical models, the proposed motion correction methods improved image quality by reducing motion artifacts in reconstructions; 3D warping performed better than the 2D methods, especially in off-center slices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.