Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24877680›Full record

ArticleClinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology2015

Mapping mental calculation systems with electrocorticography.

Keisuke Ueda, Erik C Brown, Katsuaki Kojima, Csaba Juhász, Eishi Asano

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keisuke UedaDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Erik C BrownPsychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences and MD-PhD Program, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Katsuaki KojimaDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Csaba JuhászDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
Eishi AsanoDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA; Department of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. Electronic address: eishi@pet.wayne.edu.
Wayne State University · US

Funding

Functional brain mapping in pediatric neurosurgeryR01NS064033 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI EISHI ASANO · 2009 to 2026
$5.7M
Quantitative multimodal analyses in pediatric epilepsy surgeryK23NS047550 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ASANO, EISHI · 2004 to 2008
$768k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS047550NINDS NIH HHS NS47550NINDS NIH HHS NS64033NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe investigated intracranially-recorded gamma activity during calculation tasks to better understand the cortical dynamics of calculation.

methodsWe studied 11 patients with focal epilepsy (age range: 9-28years) who underwent measurement of calculation- and naming-related gamma-augmentation during extraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG). The patients were instructed to overtly verbalize a one-word answer in response to auditorily-delivered calculation and naming questions. The assigned calculation tasks were addition and subtraction involving integers between 1 and 17.

resultsOut of the 1001 analyzed cortical electrode sites, 63 showed gamma-augmentation at 50-120Hz elicited by both tasks, 88 specifically during naming, and 7 specifically during calculation. Common gamma-augmentation mainly took place in the Rolandic regions. Calculation-specific gamma-augmentation, involving the period between the question-offset and response-onset, was noted in the middle-temporal, inferior-parietal, inferior post-central, middle-frontal, and premotor regions of the left hemisphere. Calculation-specific gamma-augmentation in the middle-temporal, inferior-parietal, and inferior post-central regions peaked around the question offset, while that in the frontal lobe peaked after the question offset and before the response onset. This study failed to detect a significant difference in calculation-specific gamma amplitude between easy trials and difficult ones requiring multi-digit operations.

conclusionsAuditorily-delivered stimuli can elicit calculation-specific gamma-augmentation in multiple regions of the left hemisphere including the parietal region. However, the additive diagnostic value of measurement of gamma-augmentation related to a simple calculation task appears modest. SIGNIFICANCE: Further studies are warranted to determine the functional significance of calculation-specific gamma-augmentation in each site, and to establish the optimal protocol for mapping mental calculation.

Indexed as

Mathematical ConceptsAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultBrain MappingChildElectroencephalographyEpilepsies, PartialFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleParietal LobeThinkingYoung AdultAngular gyrusAuditoryCognitionEvent-related synchronizationFunctional brain mappingIntracranial ECoG recordingLanguageNumberNumeralPediatric epilepsy surgeryPhysiological high-frequency oscillations (HFOs)RipplesSpatio-temporal-dynamicsSpeechSubdural EEGTime-frequency analysis

Identifiers

PMID24877680
PMCPMC4225188
OpenAlexW2044556844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.