Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24877167›Full record

Trial reportCancer2014

Multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a mucoadhesive hydrogel (MuGard) in mitigating oral mucositis symptoms in patients being treated with chemoradiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck.

Ron R Allison, Aaron A Ambrad, Youssef Arshoun, Richard J Carmel, Doug F Ciuba, Elizabeth Feldman, Steven E Finkelstein, Ranjini Gandhavadi, Dwight E Heron, Steven C Lane and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02735317 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of FORRAD® for the Management of Radiation-induced Mucositis in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Receiving IMRT: A Single-center, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorYun-fei XiaRan2016 to 2017Enrolled90ConditionsNasopharyngeal Neoplasms, StomatitisArmsOral Ulcer Gargle (FORRAD®), Quadruple mixture, composed of dexamethasone, gentamicin, vitamin B12, and procaine
NCT05164367 early_phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of Atropine Oral Gel in Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2022 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsCerebral Palsy, SialorrheaArmsAtropine sulfate gel (0.01%)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ayurvedic Drug Triphala in Combination with Providone Iodine Mitigates Radiation-Induced Mucositis in Head and Neck Cancer Patients without Affecting the Tumor Response.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Oral mucositis: the hidden side of cancer therapy.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2020
    Review
  14. Is pain part of a systemic syndrome in head and neck cancer?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Ron R Allison
Aaron A Ambrad
Youssef Arshoun
Richard J Carmel
Doug F Ciuba
Elizabeth Feldman
Steven E Finkelstein
Ranjini Gandhavadi
Dwight E Heron
Steven C Lane
John M Longo
Charles Meakin
Dimitrios Papadopoulos
David E Pruitt
Lynn M Steinbrenner
Michael A Taylor
William M Wisbeck
Grace E Yuh
David P Nowotnik
Stephen T Sonis
21st Century Oncology (United States) · USAllegheny General Hospital · USCalifornia State University, Chico · USColumbia St. Mary's Hospital · USGaston Memorial Hospital · USJohn Muir Health · USMercy Medical Center · USMissouri Valley Cancer Consortium · USNational Cancer Center of Georgia · GEOrlando Health · USPeaceHealth St. Joseph Medical Center · USProvidence Regional Medical Center Everett · USSignature Healthcare Brockton Hospital · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USVassar Brothers Medical Center · USVA Western New York Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this trial was to determine how a mucoadhesive hydrogel (MuGard), a marketed medical device, would fare when tested with the strictness of a conventional multi-institutional, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study format.

methodsA total of 120 subjects planned to receive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for treatment of head and neck cancers were randomized to receive either MuGard or sham control rinse (SC) during CRT. Subjects completed the validated Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire. Weight, opiate use, and World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis (OM) scores were recorded. Subjects who dosed at least once daily during the first 2.5 weeks of CRT were included in the efficacy analysis.

resultsOf 120 subjects enrolled, 78 (SC, N=41; MuGard, N=37) were eligible for efficacy analysis. Both cohorts were similar in demographics, baseline characteristics, primary tumor type, and planned CRT regimen. MuGard effectively mitigated OM symptoms as reflected by area under the curve of daily patient-reported oral soreness (P=.034) and WHO scores on the last day of radiation therapy (P=.038). MuGard was also associated with nonsignificant trends related to therapeutic benefit including opioid use duration, and OM scores (WHO criteria) at CRT week 4. Rinse compliance was identical between cohorts. No significant adverse events were reported, and the adverse event incidence was similar between cohorts.

conclusionsTesting MuGard, a rinse marketed as a device, in a standard clinical trial format demonstrated its superiority to SC in mitigating OM symptoms, delaying OM progression, and its safety and tolerability.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylateMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaNeoplasm StagingPlacebosSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckHydrogel, Polyethylene Glycol DimethacrylatePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID24877167
PMCPMC4164024
OpenAlexW1568674147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.