Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24877099›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

A survey of Italian physicians' opinion about stem cells research: what doctors prefer and what the law requires.

Paola Frati, Matteo Gulino, Arianna Pacchiarotti, Stefano D'Errico, Lorella Sicuro, Vittorio Fineschi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paola FratiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy ; Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo, Neuromed, IRCCS, 86170 Isernia, Italy.
Matteo GulinoDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0146-1314
Arianna PacchiarottiDepartment of Obstetric Gynaecological and Urological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Stefano D'ErricoLegal Medicine Unit, Hospital "Campo di Marte", 55100 Lucca, Italy.
Lorella SicuroItalian National Institute of Statistics, 34 Via Caduta del Forte, 65121 Pescara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1229-7545
Vittorio FineschiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1686-3236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the Italian physicians' knowledge/information level about the therapeutic potential of stem cells, the research choice between embryonic and cordonal stem cells, and the preference between autologous and heterologous storage of cordonal stem cells, we performed a national survey. The questionnaire--distributed to 3361 physicians--involved physicians of different religious orientations and of different medical specialities. Most of the physicians involved (67%) were Catholics, and the majority were gynaecologists and paediatricians (43%) who are mainly in charge to inform future mothers about the possibility of cordonal stem cells conservation. The majority of the physicians interviewed do not have specific knowledge about stem cells (59%), most of them having only generic information (92%). The largest part of physicians prefer to use umbilical cord blood cells rather than embryonic stem cells. Nevertheless, a large percentage of physicians were in favour of embryo research, especially when embryos are supernumerary (44% versus 34%). Eighty-seven % of the physicians interviewed proved to have a general knowledge about stem cells and believe in their therapeutic potential. They prefer research on cordonal stem cells rather than on embryo stem cells. Although they are in favour of heterologous stem cells donation, they still prefer cryopreservation for personal use.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelExpert TestimonyPhysiciansStem CellsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedBiomedical ResearchFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24877099
PMCPMC4022064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.