Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24877078›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2014

The effects of high-intensity versus low-intensity resistance training on leg extensor power and recovery of knee function after ACL-reconstruction.

Theresa Bieler, Nanna Aue Sobol, Lars L Andersen, Peter Kiel, Peter Løfholm, Per Aagaard, S Peter Magnusson, Michael R Krogsgaard, Nina Beyer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06846164 (Effects of Progressive Resistance Exercises on Range of Motion & Strength and Function Among Athletes With Hamstring Deficit After ACL Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06846164 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Progressive Resistance Exercises on Range of Motion & Strength and Function Among Athletes With Hamstring Deficit After ACL Reconstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsSports Physical TherapyArmsSupervised progressive strength training including elements of neuromuscular exercise intervention (SNG), home based low-intensity weight-bearing exercise protocol.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa BielerMusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark ; Institute of Sports Medicine, Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9666-0027
Nanna Aue SobolMusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark ; Institute of Sports Medicine, Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars L AndersenNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter KielInstitute of Sports Medicine, Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter LøfholmInstitute of Sports Medicine, Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per AagaardInstitute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, SDU Muscle Research Cluster (SMRC), University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9773-7361
S Peter MagnussonMusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark ; Institute of Sports Medicine, Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael R KrogsgaardSection for Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nina BeyerMusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark ; Institute of Sports Medicine, Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 NV Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-260X
University of Copenhagen · DKNational Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePersistent weakness is a common problem after anterior cruciate ligament- (ACL-) reconstruction. This study investigated the effects of high-intensity (HRT) versus low-intensity (LRT) resistance training on leg extensor power and recovery of knee function after ACL-reconstruction.

methods31 males and 19 females were randomized to HRT (n = 24) or LRT (n = 26) from week 8-20 after ACL-reconstruction. Leg extensor power, joint laxity, and self-reported knee function were measured before and 7, 14, and 20 weeks after surgery. Hop tests were assessed before and after 20 weeks.

resultsPower in the injured leg was 90% (95% CI 86-94%) of the noninjured leg, decreasing to 64% (95% CI 60-69%) 7 weeks after surgery. During the resistance training phase there was a significant group by time interaction for power (P = 0.020). Power was regained more with HRT compared to LRT at week 14 (84% versus 73% of noninjured leg, resp.; P = 0.027) and at week 20 (98% versus 83% of noninjured leg, resp.; P = 0.006) without adverse effects on joint laxity. No other between-group differences were found.

conclusionHigh-intensity resistance training during rehabilitation after ACL-reconstruction can improve muscle power without adverse effects on joint laxity.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyMuscle StrengthRecovery of FunctionAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointLegMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24877078
PMCPMC4022205
OpenAlexW2060792894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.