Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24877033›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2014

MiT translocation renal cell carcinomas: two subgroups of tumours with translocations involving 6p21 [t (6; 11)] and Xp11.2 [t (X;1 or X or 17)].

Milan Hora, Tomáš Urge, Ivan Trávníček, Jiří Ferda, Zdeněk Chudáček, Tomáš Vaněček, Michal Michal, Fredrik Petersson, Naoto Kuroda, Ondřej Hes

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oncologic outcomes of nephron-sparing surgery in patients with T1 multifocal renal cell carcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Milan HoraDepartment of Urology Faculty Hospital, E. Beneše 13, Pilsen, 305 99 Czech Republic ; Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Tomáš UrgeDepartment of Urology Faculty Hospital, E. Beneše 13, Pilsen, 305 99 Czech Republic ; Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ivan TrávníčekDepartment of Urology Faculty Hospital, E. Beneše 13, Pilsen, 305 99 Czech Republic ; Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří FerdaDepartment of Radiology, Pilsen, Czech Republic ; Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Zdeněk ChudáčekDepartment of Radiology, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Tomáš VaněčekDepartment of Pathology, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Michal MichalDepartment of Pathology, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic ; Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Fredrik PeterssonDepartment of Pathology, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Naoto KurodaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital, Kochi, Japan.
Ondřej HesDepartment of Pathology, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic ; Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pilsen Tools (Czechia) · CZCharles University · CZJapanese Red Cross Kochi Hospital · JPNational University Health System · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMiT translocation renal cell carcinomas (TRCC) predominantly occur in younger patients with only 25% of patients being over 40 years. TRCC contains two main subgroups with translocations involving 6p21 or Xp11.2. Herein we present 10 cases. MATERIALS: Eight cases were treated at main author's institution (identified among 1653 (0.48%) cases of kidney tumours in adults). Two cases were retrieved from the Pilsen (CZ) Tumour Registry.

resultsSix cases were type Xp11.2 and four 6p21; 7 female, 3 male patients; Xp11.2 4:2, 6p21 3:1. The mean age 49 years (range: 21-80), 5 patients (50%) over 40 years. The mean age of the group with Xp11.2 TRCCs was 55 (median 51) and 6p21 41 (32) years. One female with a 6p21 tumour (24 years) underwent nephrectomy at 4 months of pregnancy. Stage (UICC, 7th ed. 2009) was 5xI, 3xIII, 2xIV. The mean size of tumour was 80 (40-165) mm. The mean follow-up was 33.2 (1-92) months. In patients with 6p21 tumours, one (25%) died after 3 months due to widely metastatic disease. In patients with Xp11.2 tumours, 3 (50%) succumbed due to metastatic disease (range 1-8 months). Three patients with Xp11.2 are alive at 7, 52 and 92 months of follow-up, were diagnosed at early stage (T1a).

conclusionTRCCs were more common in females. Patient with 6p21 tumours were younger than those with Xp11.2. Both types have definitive malignant potential Type Xp11.2 seems to be a more aggressive neoplasm than 6p21. The case with metastatic 6p21 tumour is the 4th case described in the English literature.

Identifiers

PMID24877033
PMCPMC4032393
OpenAlexW2157122037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.