Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24876772›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2014

Physicochemical features and transfection properties of chitosan/poloxamer 188/poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoplexes.

Donato Cosco, Cinzia Federico, Jessica Maiuolo, Stefania Bulotta, Roberto Molinaro, Donatella Paolino, Pierfrancesco Tassone, Massimo Fresta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. α-Acylamino-β-lactoneAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MicroRNA delivery through nanoparticles.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Donato CoscoDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy ; Interregional Research Center for Food Safety and Health, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Cinzia FedericoDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy ; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Jessica MaiuoloDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Stefania BulottaDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Roberto MolinaroDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy ; Department of NanoMedicine, The Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA.
Donatella PaolinoDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy ; Interregional Research Center for Food Safety and Health, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Pierfrancesco TassoneDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy ; Medical Oncology, Tommaso Campanella Cancer Center, Viale S Venuta, Germaneto, Italy.
Massimo FrestaDepartment of Health Sciences, University Magna Græcia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy ; Interregional Research Center for Food Safety and Health, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Department of Medical Sciences · BYMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was the evaluation of the effects of two emulsifiers on the physicochemical and technological properties of low molecular weight chitosan/poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoplexes and their transfection efficiency. Nanospheres were prepared using the nanoprecipitation method of the preformed polymer. The mean diameter and surface charge of the nanospheres were investigated by photocorrelation spectroscopy. The degree of binding of the plasmid with the nanoplexes was qualitatively and quantitatively determined. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) testing was performed using HeLa, RPMI8226, and SKMM1 cell lines. Flow cytometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to determine the degree of cellular transfection and internalization of the nanoplexes into cells, respectively. The nanoplexes had a positive zeta potential, and low amounts of PLGA and poloxamer 188 showed a mean colloidal size of ~200 nm with a polydispersity index of ~0.14. The nanoplexes had suitable entrapment efficiency (80%). In vitro experiments showed that the colloidal nanodevices did not induce significant cytotoxicity. The nanoplexes investigated in this study could represent efficient and useful nonviral devices for gene delivery. Use of low amounts of PLGA and poloxamer 188 enabled development of a nanosphere able to transfect cells efficiently. These nanosystems are a helpful platform for delivery of genetic material while preserving therapeutic efficacy.

Indexed as

ChitosanDNAEmulsionsHeLa CellsHumansLactic AcidNanocapsulesNanocompositesPoloxamerPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerTransfectionChitosanDNAEmulsionsLactic AcidNanocapsulesPoloxamerPolyglycolic AcidPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymerchitosangene deliverynanoplexespoloxamer 188poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide)

Identifiers

PMID24876772
PMCPMC4035313
OpenAlexW1987226509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.