Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24876632›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2014

Grounding evidence-based approaches to cancer prevention in the community: a case study of mammography barriers in underserved African American women.

Linda Highfield, L Kay Bartholomew, Marieke A Hartman, M Molly Ford, Philomene Balihe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Black Women's Perspectives on Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Stakeholder Engagement in Adoption, Implementation, and Sustainment of an Evidence-Based Intervention to Increase Mammography Adherence Among Low-Income Women.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Linda HighfieldUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA linda.d.highfield@uth.tmc.edu.
L Kay BartholomewUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Marieke A HartmanUniversity of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
M Molly FordEpiscopal Health Charities, Houston, TX, USA.
Philomene BaliheEpiscopal Health Charities, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE EDUCATION--CANCER PREVENTION/CONTROLR25CA057712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MULLEN, PATRICIA DOLAN · 1992 to 2017
$8.6M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057712NCI NIH HHS R25 CA57712
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When community health planners select an evidence-based intervention that has been developed and tested in one situation and adapt it for use in a different situation or community, best practice suggests needs assessment and formative research in the new setting. Cancer prevention planners who are interested in adopting and adapting evidence-based approaches need to base their choices on a sound understanding of the health or behavioral risk problem in which they mean to intervene. This requires a balancing act of weighing community information against a broader perspective from the scientific literature and using the combination to identify and adapt an evidence-based intervention program that is likely to be effective in the new setting. This report is a case study of a community and organizational assessment conducted as a foundation for selecting and recommending adaptation of an evidence-based intervention for improving mammography appointment attendance. We used an inductive sequential exploratory mixed-methods design to inform this process. The process provides a model for formative research grounding evidence-based practice for cancer control planners. Future studies that incorporate findings from needs assessment into the adaptation of the selected intervention program may promote the effective dissemination of evidence-based programs.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanEvidence-Based PracticeBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFocus GroupsHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMammographyMedically UninsuredOrganizational Case StudiesPatient CompliancePovertybreast cancercancer prevention and controlcommunity-based participatory researchformative evaluationhealth disparitieshealth promotionhealth researchprogram planning and evaluation

Identifiers

PMID24876632
PMCPMC4216624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.