Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24876618›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2014

Continuous glucose monitoring in newborn infants: how do errors in calibration measurements affect detected hypoglycemia?

Felicity Thomas, Mathew Signal, Deborah L Harris, Philip J Weston, Jane E Harding, Geoffrey M Shaw, J Geoffrey Chase, CHYLD Study Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2017
    Article
  8. Continuous glucose monitoring in neonates: a review.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017
    Review
  9. Performance of Cleared Blood Glucose Monitors.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Felicity ThomasDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Mathew SignalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Deborah L HarrisLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Newborn Intensive Care Unit, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Philip J WestonNewborn Intensive Care Unit, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Jane E HardingLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Geoffrey M ShawDepartment of Intensive Care, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Science, University of Otago, New Zealand.
J Geoffrey ChaseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand geoff.chase@canterbury.ac.nz.
CHYLD Study Group
University of Canterbury · NZUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Otago · NZWaikato District Health Board · NZ

Funding

Children with Hypoglycemia and their Later Development (the CHYLD Study)R01HD069622 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND · PI HARDING, JANE · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069622NICHD NIH HHS R01HD069622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal hypoglycemia is common and can cause serious brain injury. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could improve hypoglycemia detection, while reducing blood glucose (BG) measurements. Calibration algorithms use BG measurements to convert sensor signals into CGM data. Thus, inaccuracies in calibration BG measurements directly affect CGM values and any metrics calculated from them. The aim was to quantify the effect of timing delays and calibration BG measurement errors on hypoglycemia metrics in newborn infants. Data from 155 babies were used. Two timing and 3 BG meter error models (Abbott Optium Xceed, Roche Accu-Chek Inform II, Nova Statstrip) were created using empirical data. Monte-Carlo methods were employed, and each simulation was run 1000 times. Each set of patient data in each simulation had randomly selected timing and/or measurement error added to BG measurements before CGM data were calibrated. The number of hypoglycemic events, duration of hypoglycemia, and hypoglycemic index were then calculated using the CGM data and compared to baseline values. Timing error alone had little effect on hypoglycemia metrics, but measurement error caused substantial variation. Abbott results underreported the number of hypoglycemic events by up to 8 and Roche overreported by up to 4 where the original number reported was 2. Nova results were closest to baseline. Similar trends were observed in the other hypoglycemia metrics. Errors in blood glucose concentration measurements used for calibration of CGM devices can have a clinically important impact on detection of hypoglycemia. If CGM devices are going to be used for assessing hypoglycemia it is important to understand of the impact of these errors on CGM data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCalibrationComputer SimulationEquipment DesignHumansHypoglycemiaInfant, NewbornMonitoring, PhysiologicMonte Carlo MethodPredictive Value of TestsReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsBiomarkersBlood Glucosealgorithmcontinuous glucose monitorhypoglycemiaintensive care unitneonatalrecalibration

Identifiers

PMID24876618
PMCPMC4455445
OpenAlexW2162461227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.