Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24876610›Full record

Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2014

Design, development, and evaluation of a novel microneedle array-based continuous glucose monitor.

Arvind Jina, Michael J Tierney, Janet A Tamada, Scott McGill, Shashi Desai, Beelee Chua, Anna Chang, Mark Christiansen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-transdermal microneedles for advanced drug delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Can we still use the Michaelis-Menten model for enzymatic microneedle sensors?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arvind JinaArKal Medical, Fremont, CA, USA ajina@arkalmedical.com.
Michael J TierneyArKal Medical, Fremont, CA, USA.
Janet A TamadaArKal Medical, Fremont, CA, USA.
Scott McGillArKal Medical, Fremont, CA, USA.
Shashi DesaiArKal Medical, Fremont, CA, USA.
Beelee ChuaArKal Medical, Fremont, CA, USA.
Anna ChangJohn Muir Physician Network Clinical Research Center, Concord, CA USA.
Mark ChristiansenDiablo Clinical Research, Walnut Creek, USA.
Diablo Clinical Research · USJohn Muir Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of accurate, minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices has been the subject of much work by several groups, as it is believed that a less invasive and more user-friendly device will result in greater adoption of CGM by persons with insulin-dependent diabetes. This article presents the results of preliminary clinical studies in subjects with diabetes of a novel prototype microneedle-based continuous glucose monitor. In this device, an array of tiny hollow microneedles is applied into the epidermis from where glucose in interstitial fluid (ISF) is transported via passive diffusion to an amperometric glucose sensor external to the body. Comparison of 1396 paired device glucose measurements and fingerstick blood glucose readings for up to 72-hour wear in 10 diabetic subjects shows the device to be accurate and well tolerated by the subjects. Overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) is 15% with 98.4% of paired points in the A+B region of the Clarke error grid. The prototype device has demonstrated clinically accurate glucose readings over 72 hours, the first time a microneedle-based device has achieved such performance.

Indexed as

NeedlesAdultAgedBiomarkersBiosensing TechniquesBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Equipment DesignExtracellular FluidFemaleHumansMaleMaterials TestingMiddle AgedBiomarkersBlood Glucosecontinuous glucoseinterstitial fluidmicroneedleminimally invasive

Identifiers

PMID24876610
PMCPMC4455438
OpenAlexW2138418310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.