ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2014
Current Trends in Continuous Glucose Monitoring.
Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microneedle Patch for Painless Intradermal Collection of Interstitial Fluid Enabling Multianalyte Measurement of Small Molecules, SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies, and Protein Profiling.Advanced healthcare materials · 2023Article
- Classification of Postprandial Glycemic Status with Application to Insulin Dosing in Type 1 Diabetes-An In Silico Proof-of-Concept.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Real-time intradermal continuous glucose monitoring using a minimally invasive microneedle-based system.Biomedical microdevices · 2018Article
- Functionalized microneedles for continuous glucose monitoring.Nano convergence · 2018Review
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Use in Diabetes Management and Possible Future Applications.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2018Article
- Self-measurement of Blood Glucose and Continuous Glucose Monitoring - Is There Only One Future?European endocrinology · 2018Review
- Rapid, low cost prototyping of transdermal devices for personal healthcare monitoring.Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research · 2017Article
- SPECTRUM.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2017Article
- Decreased complexity of glucose dynamics preceding the onset of diabetes in mice and rats.PloS one · 2017Article
- Designing an artificial pancreas architecture: the AP@home experience.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2015Article
- Routine use of continuous glucose monitoring in 10 501 people with diabetes mellitus.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2015Article
- Prediction of dexamethasone release from PLGA microspheres prepared with polymer blends using a design of experiment approach.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The market introduction of systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) some 15 years ago did not immediately revolutionize the treatment of diabetes; however, for a given group of patients, it would almost be inconceivable nowadays to imagine life without CGM. One day the development of insulin pumps together with CGM could culminate in an artificial pancreas system. The performance of the glucose sensors used for glucose measurement in the interstitial fluid in the subcutaneous tissue and the algorithms employed to analyze these data have improved so much over the past decade that current CGM systems by far outperform those of the first generations. This commentary discusses a number of aspects about what we have learned since CGM systems entered the market and what current trends exist in their usage. Some of these are major hurdles facing a more widespread usage of CGM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.