Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24876542›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2014

Short-Term Thermal-Humidity Shock Affects Point-of-Care Glucose Testing: Implications for Health Professionals and Patients.

Mandy Lam, Richard F Louie, Corbin M Curtis, William J Ferguson, John H Vy, Anh-Thu Truong, Stephanie L Sumner, Gerald J Kost

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Computing the surveillance error grid analysis: procedure and examples.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mandy LamUC Davis POC Technologies Center, Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Richard F LouieUC Davis POC Technologies Center, Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA rflouie@ucdavis.edu.
Corbin M CurtisUC Davis POC Technologies Center, Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
William J FergusonUC Davis POC Technologies Center, Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
John H VyUC Davis POC Technologies Center, Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Anh-Thu TruongUC Davis POC Technologies Center, Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Stephanie L SumnerUC Davis POC Technologies Center, Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Gerald J KostUC Davis POC Technologies Center, Point-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · USCenter Point · US

Funding

Rapid Multipathogen Detection for POCT and National Diaster ReadinessU54EB007959 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KOST, GERALD JOSEPH · 2007 to 2011
$8.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to assess the effects of short-term (≤1 hour) static high temperature and humidity stresses on the performance of point-of-care (POC) glucose test strips and meters. Glucose meters are used by medical responders and patients in a variety of settings including hospitals, clinics, homes, and the field. Reagent test strips and instruments are potentially exposed to austere environmental conditions. Glucose test strips and meters were exposed to a mean relative humidity of 83.0% (SD = 8.0%) and temperature of 42°C (107.6°F, SD = 3.2) in a Tenney BTRC environmental chamber. Stressed and unstressed glucose reagent strips and meters were tested with spiked blood samples (n = 40 measurements per time point for each of 4 trials) after 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes of exposure. Wilcoxon's signed rank test was applied to compare measurements test strip and meter measurements to isolate and characterize the magnitude of meter versus test strip effects individually. Stressed POC meters and test strips produced elevated glucose results, with stressed meter bias as high as 20 mg/dL (17.7% error), and stressed test strip bias as high as 13 mg/dL (12.2% error). The aggregate stress effect on meter and test strips yielded a positive bias as high as 33 mg/dL (30.1% error) after 15 minutes of exposure. Short-term exposure (15 minutes) to high temperature and humidity can significantly affect the performance of POC glucose test strips and meters, with measurement biases that potentially affect clinical decision making and patient safety.

Indexed as

clinical decision makingenvironmental stressglucose test strip and meter performancemeasurement errorpatient safetyquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID24876542
PMCPMC4454105
OpenAlexW2035476931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.