Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24876454›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2014

Cross-sectional survey and retrospective analysis of a large cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes with long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment.

Michael Joubert, Julia Morera, Angel Vicente, Anne Rod, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Yves Reznik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diabetes technology and sexual health: which role?Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Improved Glycemic Control Following Transition to Tubeless Insulin Pump Therapy in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bolus Calculator Safety Mandates a Need for Standards.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Technology to Reduce Hypoglycemia.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2015
    Review
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael JoubertEndocrinology Department, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France joubert-m@chu-caen.fr.
Julia MoreraEndocrinology Department, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France University of Caen (UNICAEN), Caen, France.
Angel VicenteEndocrinology Department, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Anne RodEndocrinology Department, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Jean-Jacques ParientiUniversity of Caen (UNICAEN), Caen, France Research and Biostatistic Department, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
Yves ReznikEndocrinology Department, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France University of Caen (UNICAEN), Caen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is an established modality for intensive insulin treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D), but long-term data concerning satisfaction, CSII function use, safety, and efficacy in real-life conditions are scarce. Methods. We analyzed a cohort of adult patients with T1D treated with CSII for more than 1 year in a single diabetes center. We performed a cross-sectional survey in 2010 (tolerance/satisfaction and behavior forms) and a retrospective analysis of medical records (including HbA1c level, hospitalization, and catheter infections). The primary objective was to assess long-term tolerance/satisfaction, and secondary objectives were safety and efficacy. Results. There were 295 patients analyzed. After a median duration of CSII use of 5 years, overall satisfaction was high for about 90% of patients. Mean CSII-related discomfort scores were low for work, recreation, and sleep and moderate for sport and sexual activity (2.5 ± 1.9, 2.6 ± 1.8, 2.6 ± 2.1, 3.4 ± 2.3, and 4.0 ± 2.9 of 10, respectively). Despite a high level of diabetes education, only one third of patients were using advanced CSII functions. During long-term follow-up, the safety of CSII treatment was good; the hospitalization rate was 0.18 patients/year, and catheter infections were scarce. The HbA1c level dropped about -0.5% independently from CSII duration (P < .05). Conclusions. In this adult cohort, satisfaction and tolerance, together with safety, of CSII were maintained at long-term follow up. The sole basic functions of CSII were currently used by patients. A 0.5% decrease in the HbA1c level was maintained during the study period.

Indexed as

Insulin Infusion SystemsAdultBlood GlucoseCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMalePatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsInsulincontinuous subcutaneous insulin infusionHbA1cinsulinquality of lifetype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID24876454
PMCPMC4455364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.