Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24876421›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2014

Childhood diabetes in the Nordic countries: a comparison of quality registries.

Lena Hanberger, Niels Birkebaek, Ragnar Bjarnason, Ann Kristin Drivvoll, Anders Johansen, Torild Skrivarhaug, Arni V Thorsson, Ulf Samuelsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Establishment of the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative (T1DX-QI).Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lena HanbergerDivision of Nursing Science, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden Division of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden lena.hanberger@lio.se.
Niels BirkebaekDepartment of Paediatrics, Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark.
Ragnar BjarnasonChildren's Medical Center, Landspítali University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Ann Kristin DrivvollWoman and Children's Division, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anders JohansenDepartment of Paediatrics, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Torild SkrivarhaugWoman and Children's Division, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway Woman and Children's Division, Department of Paediatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Arni V ThorssonChildren's Medical Center, Landspítali University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Ulf SamuelssonDivision of Paediatrics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2008 a Nordic collaboration was established between the quality registries in Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden to improve quality of care for children with diabetes. This study aimed to describe those registries and confirm that the registry variables are comparable. Selected variables were used to demonstrate outcome measurements. The organization of the registries and methodology are described. Cross-sectional data for patients between birth and 14.9 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus in 2009 (n = 6523) from 89 centers were analyzed. Variables were age, gender, and diabetic ketoacidosis at onset, together with age, gender, HbA1c, insulin regimen, and severe hypoglycemia at follow-up in 2009. All 4 registries use a standardized registration at the onset of diabetes and at follow-up, conducted at the local pediatric diabetes centers. Methods for measuring HbA1c varied as did methods of registration for factors such as hypoglycemia. No differences were found between the outcomes of the clinical variables at onset. Significant variations were found at follow-up for mean HbA1c, the proportion of children with HbA1c < 57 mmol/mol (NGSP/DCCT 7.4%), (range 15-31%), the proportion with insulin pumps (range 34-55%), and the numbers with severe hypoglycemia (range 5.6-8.3/100 patient years). In this large unselected population from 4 Nordic countries, a high proportion did not reach their treatment target, indicating a need to improve the quality of pediatric diabetes care. International collaboration is needed to develop and harmonize quality indicators and offers possibilities to study large geographic populations, identify problems, and share knowledge.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsInfantInfant, NewbornInsulin Infusion SystemsKetosisGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsDiabetes Mellitus Type 1glycosylatedhemoglobin A1cpediatricsQuality of Health CareRegistries

Identifiers

PMID24876421
PMCPMC4764231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.