Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24875792›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2014

Provider and patient expectations for dietary supplement discussions.

Derjung M Tarn, Jennifer R Guzmán, Jeffrey S Good, Neil S Wenger, Ian D Coulter, Debora A Paterniti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Perceptions of Patients with Primary Nonadherence to Statin Medications.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Derjung M TarnDepartment of Family Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA, dtarn@mednet.ucla.edu.
Jennifer R Guzmán
Jeffrey S Good
Neil S Wenger
Ian D Coulter
Debora A Paterniti

Funding

Physician-Patient Communication ProjectR01AT005883 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TARN, DERJUNG M · 2010 to 2013
$2.0M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT005883NCCIH NIH HHS R01AT005883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary supplement use in the United States is common. Patients can procure supplements without a prescription, and often do not disclose supplement use to their healthcare providers. Providers and patients may be uncertain about what would be appropriate or helpful in discussions of supplements during routine office visits.

objectiveTo explore provider and patient expectations for discussions of dietary supplements.

designSemi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of healthcare providers from three specialties and their patients who reported taking supplements.

participantsThirty-five outpatient providers (14 primary care, six integrative medicine, and 15 complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) providers) and 107 of their patients. APPROACH: Qualitative analysis of transcripts using grounded theory and iterative review.

resultsBoth providers and patients raised twelve common topics about dietary supplements that they felt were important to discuss during office visits, such as: supplements taken; supplement risks (interactions, safety/harm, side effects/adverse events); treatment benefits; efficacy; alternative treatments; and patient expectations/preferences for treatment. Some topics were mentioned more frequently by providers than patients, such as how to take, reason for taking, and evidence for use. Providers raised several topics that were mentioned infrequently by patients. Supplement costs and regulations were not brought up by any patients, even though consideration of these topics could influence patient decisions to take supplements. Complementary healthcare providers brought up topics not mentioned by primary care providers, such as the importance of supplement brands and supplement mega-dosing.

conclusionsPatients and providers have concordant views about the need to discuss patient supplement use and ensure patient safety. Patients may undervalue, be unaware of, or discount information about cost or regulations that could affect their decision-making about supplement use. Future studies could examine the value, acceptability, and influence of a more comprehensive approach to discussions to help patients appropriately evaluate supplements.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOffice VisitsPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysician's RoleAdultAgedDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID24875792
PMCPMC4139527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.