Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24875610›Full record

Trial reportJAMA ophthalmology2014

Sustained visual acuity loss in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials.

Gui-shuang Ying, Benjamin J Kim, Maureen G Maguire, Jiayan Huang, Ebenezer Daniel, Glenn J Jaffe, Juan E Grunwald, Kevin J Blinder, Christina J Flaxel, Firas Rahhal and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA ophthalmology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00593450 (Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00593450 phase3completednot on this map

Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials: Lucentis-Avastin Trial (CATT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2008 to 2015Enrolled1,208ConditionsAge Related Macular DegenerationArmsranibizumab, bevacizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Biomedicines · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Gui-shuang YingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Benjamin J KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Maureen G MaguireDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Jiayan HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ebenezer DanielDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Glenn J JaffeDuke Eye Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Juan E GrunwaldDepartment of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kevin J BlinderBarnes Retina Institute, St Louis, Missouri.
Christina J FlaxelCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Firas RahhalRetina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group, Beverly Hills, California.
Carl RegilloWills Eye Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniel F MartinCole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
CATT Research Group
University of Pennsylvania · USCleveland Eye Clinic · USDuke Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USRetina Institute · USRetina Vitreous Associates Medical Group · USWills Eye Hospital · US

Funding

Coordinating Center for the Comparison of AMD Treatments TrialsU10EY017823 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MAGUIRE, MAUREEN G · 2006 to 2012
$19.2M
Photograph Reading Center for the Comparison of AMD Treatment TrialsU10EY017826 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRUNWALD, JUAN E · 2006 to 2013
$2.8M
Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials-OCT Reading CenterU10EY017825 · NEI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JAFFE, GLENN · 2006 to 2013
$2.3M
Chair Grant for the Comparison of AMD Treatment TrialsU10EY017828 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, DANIEL F · 2006 to 2012
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017823NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017825NEI NIH HHS U10 EY017826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAlthough anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) results in improved vision overall, loss of substantial vision can occur. Understanding the processes that lead to loss of vision may lead to preventive strategies.

objectiveTo determine the incidence, characteristics, causes, and baseline predictors of sustained visual acuity loss after 2 years of treatment with ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular AMD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA cohort study within a randomized clinical trial of participants in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials (CATT).

interventionsParticipants were randomly assigned to treatment with ranibizumab or bevacizumab and to 2 years of monthly or as needed injections or monthly injections for 1 year and as needed injections the following year. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Sustained visual acuity loss, defined as loss of 15 or more letters from baseline at weeks 88 and 104.

resultsAmong 1030 participants, 61 eyes (5.9%) developed sustained visual acuity loss in 2 years. Within this group, visual acuity decreased gradually over time, with a mean decrease of 2, 19, and 33 letters from baseline at 4 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years, respectively. At 2 years, eyes with sustained visual acuity loss had more scarring (60.0% vs 41.4%, P = .007), more geographic atrophy (GA) (31.6% vs 20.7%, P = .004), larger lesions (16 vs 8 mm2, P < .001), and higher proportions of intraretinal fluid (82.5% vs 51.0%, P < .001), subretinal hyperreflective material (84.5% vs 44.2%, P < .001), retinal thinning (43.3% vs 23.0%, P < .001), and thickening (20.0% vs 12.1%, P < .001). Likely causes of sustained visual acuity loss included foveal scarring (44.3%), pigmentary abnormalities (27.9%), and foveal GA (11.5%). Baseline factors independently associated with a higher incidence of sustained visual acuity loss were the presence of nonfoveal GA (odds ratio [OR],  2.86; 95% CI, 1.35-6.08; P = .006), larger area of choroidal neovascularization (OR for a >4-disc area vs ≤1-disc area, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.70-9.03; P = .007), and bevacizumab treatment (OR,  1.83; 95% CI, 1.07-3.14; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Sustained visual acuity loss was relatively rare in CATT. The development of foveal scar, pigmentary abnormalities, or GA contributed to most of the sustained visual acuity loss. Risk was 3% higher among eyes treated with bevacizumab. Treatment that targeted the prevention of scarring or GA may improve vision outcomes.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00593450.

Indexed as

Visual AcuityAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabHumansIncidenceMacular DegenerationMiddle AgedRanibizumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabRanibizumab

Identifiers

PMID24875610
PMCPMC4151260
OpenAlexW2096097549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.